Balamurugan T, Manimaran P
27/1, Sanjai Nagar, Erode, 638011 Tamilnadu India.
Department of Prosthodontics, JKK Nataraja Dental College & Hospital, Komarapalayam, Namakkal, 638183 Tamilnadu India.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013 Sep;13(3):226-32. doi: 10.1007/s13191-012-0141-x. Epub 2012 Aug 19.
Accuracy of the implant impression technique is one of the key factor determining the strain free fit of the prosthesis fabricated which influences the treatment success. Two implant impression techniques namely the closed tray technique with transfer coping and open tray technique were evaluated for accuracy with stone casts obtained from them. Casts were evaluated using a custom constructed bar on strain gage (SYSCOM) and abutment coordinates using Coordinate Measuring Machine (TESA micro-HITE). The statistical analysis with one way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney tests show that the casts obtained with open tray technique were accurate than the casts of closed tray technique (significance P < 0.001). Direct transfer impression technique with less number of components ensures the high accuracy of transfer of implant positions from master cast to the laboratory cast compared to the indirect transfer impression technique.
种植体印模技术的准确性是决定所制作假体无应变贴合度的关键因素之一,而这会影响治疗的成功率。对两种种植体印模技术,即带转移帽的封闭托盘技术和开放托盘技术,通过从它们获得的石膏模型来评估其准确性。使用定制的应变片杆(SYSCOM)对模型进行评估,并使用坐标测量机(TESA micro-HITE)测量基台坐标。单因素方差分析和曼-惠特尼检验的统计分析表明,开放托盘技术获得的模型比封闭托盘技术的模型更精确(显著性P < 0.001)。与间接转移印模技术相比,部件数量较少的直接转移印模技术可确保种植体位置从主模型到实验室模型的转移具有更高的准确性。