Forensic Anthropology Research Centre, Department of Anatomy, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Forensic Anthropology Research Centre, Department of Anatomy, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Mar;236:192.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.023. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
Age estimation in unknown adult skeletons remains a considerable problem in forensic anthropology. In 1992, Lamendin et al. published a non-destructive method of age estimation on single rooted teeth. With this method, periodontosis and root transparency are judged against root height, and these are then used in regression formulae to estimate age. The aim of this study was to test the accuracy of the Lamendin method on a large sample of canines of South Africans, and if necessary to adapt the formulae for this population. A sample of known sex, age and population group was used. This included 537 upper and lower canines from 498 skulls, and included black males, black females, white males and white females. The age of the individuals ranged from 20 to 90 years. The original formulae gave relatively poor results, and in an attempt to obtain better accuracy the formulae were adapted with the current data. Even after adaptation of the formulae, the highest correlation between estimated age and actual age remained low (R(2)=0.41), with mean errors ranging between 12 and 15 years. Periodontosis was better correlated with age than root transparency. The accuracy of the method was found to be much lower than what was originally published, but probably reflects biological reality and is on a par with other methods of adult age estimation.
在法医学人类学中,对于未知成年人骨骼的年龄估计仍然是一个相当大的问题。1992 年,Lamendin 等人发表了一种对单根牙齿进行年龄估计的非破坏性方法。使用这种方法,可以根据牙根高度判断牙周病和牙根透明度,并将这些用于回归公式来估计年龄。本研究的目的是在大量南非犬齿样本上测试 Lamendin 方法的准确性,如果有必要,针对该人群调整公式。使用了已知性别、年龄和人群的样本。这包括 498 个头骨的 537 颗上下犬齿,其中包括黑人男性、黑人女性、白人男性和白人女性。个体的年龄从 20 岁到 90 岁不等。原始公式的结果相对较差,为了获得更好的准确性,尝试用当前数据对公式进行了调整。即使在调整了公式之后,估计年龄与实际年龄之间的最高相关性仍然较低(R²=0.41),平均误差在 12 到 15 岁之间。牙周病与年龄的相关性优于牙根透明度。该方法的准确性远低于最初的公布值,但可能反映了生物学的实际情况,与其他成人年龄估计方法相当。