Suppr超能文献

制定一个全面的量表来评估大学多元文化项目。

Developing a comprehensive scale to assess college multicultural programming.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee.

出版信息

J Couns Psychol. 2014 Jan;61(1):133-45. doi: 10.1037/a0035214.

Abstract

A barrier to assessing effectiveness of multicultural programming is lack of a relatively brief instrument to measure the wide range of intended outcomes. A frequent goal of programming is to increase cultural empathy, but this is rarely the only intended outcome. We conducted focus groups of campus administrators, student affairs staff, and undergraduate instructors who identified a full range of racial/ethnic multicultural competencies that undergraduates should possess. An 84-item pool generated from these focus groups was combined with the 31-item Scale of Ethnocultural Empathy (SEE; Wang et al., 2003). These 115 items, together with instruments used to gauge concurrent validity, were administered to White undergraduate students in introductory psychology courses at the midpoint (n = 602) and end (n = 676) of fall semester. Exploratory factor analysis suggested 6 subscales for the Everyday Multicultural Competencies/Revised SEE (EMC/RSEE): (a) Cultural Openness and Desire to Learn; (b) Resentment and Cultural Dominance; (c) Anxiety and Lack of Multicultural Self-Efficacy; (d) Empathic Perspective-Taking; (e) Awareness of Contemporary Racism and Privilege; and (f) Empathic Feeling and Acting as an Ally. Item response theory principles guided final selection of subscale items. Analyses suggested good factor stability, reliability, and discriminant validity of the 48-item EMC/RSEE in these undergraduate samples. EMC/RSEE subscales were not strongly correlated with a measure of impression management and were significantly associated with measures of Openness to Diversity Challenge, and Universal-Diverse Orientation.

摘要

评估多元文化计划效果的一个障碍是缺乏相对简短的工具来衡量广泛的预期结果。该计划的一个常见目标是增强文化同理心,但这通常不是唯一的预期结果。我们对校园管理人员、学生事务人员和本科教师进行了焦点小组讨论,他们确定了本科生应具备的一系列全面的种族/民族多元文化能力。从这些焦点小组中产生的 84 项条目与 31 项文化同理心量表(SEE;Wang 等人,2003)相结合。这 115 个项目与用于衡量并行有效性的工具一起,在秋季学期的中点(n=602)和结束时(n=676),被分配给参加入门心理学课程的白人本科生。探索性因素分析表明,日常多元文化能力/修订后的 SEE(EMC/RSEE)有 6 个分量表:(a)文化开放性和学习愿望;(b)怨恨和文化主导地位;(c)焦虑和缺乏多元文化自我效能感;(d)同理心换位思考;(e)意识到当代种族主义和特权;(f)同理心感受和作为盟友的行动。项目反应理论原则指导了最终选择分量表项目。在这些本科生样本中,分析表明 EMC/RSEE 的 48 项具有良好的因子稳定性、可靠性和区分效度。EMC/RSEE 分量表与印象管理量表的相关性不强,与多样性挑战开放性量表和普遍多样性取向量表显著相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验