Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiology, Faculty of Radiation Oncology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2014 Mar;26(3):162-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2013.12.007. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
Since 2005, radiation oncology trainees in Australia and New Zealand have had to undertake a piece of original research during training, and submit a manuscript, as first author, for senior peer-review. Satisfactory completion of this requirement is one component of eligibility to sit the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists Fellowship examinations. The purpose of this study was to examine the value of this curriculum requirement, including the publication rates and potential barriers to trainee research.
An online survey was sent to 116 radiation oncologists/trainees who trained since the mandatory research requirement was introduced (2005-2011). Questions concerned research topics, publications, subsequent research activity, perceptions on barriers to research and aids to conducting research during training. A web-based search of PubMed by author name was carried out to complete and verify publication statistics.
In total, 108 (93.1%) of the 116 trainees across 20 centres who submitted their research papers to the Radiation Oncology Faculty Research Committee were successful in meeting the required standard first time. Half of these trainees ultimately published their paper in a peer-reviewed journal. Of trainees responding to the survey, 62% presented their research at a scientific meeting. Most of the studies were either retrospective (62.3%) or dosimetry/physics projects (10.1%). The main problems encountered in conducting projects were competing clinical commitments and lack of dedicated research time. Notably, long ethics approval processes, lack of supervision and statistical support for projects were not considered barriers.
This mandatory research requirement ensures trainees initiate and complete at least one project during their training. Since the introduction of this curriculum component, half of the research projects have resulted in publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Increased 'protected time' and training in scientific writing and methods may improve publication rates and quality. This first review of the Australian and New Zealand radiation oncology trainee research requirement highlights areas that need to be addressed to further support and foster a research culture among junior radiation oncologists.
自 2005 年以来,澳大利亚和新西兰的放射肿瘤学受训者在培训期间必须进行一项原创研究,并作为第一作者提交一份稿件进行高级同行评审。满足这一要求是有资格参加澳大利亚皇家和新西兰放射科医师学院研究员考试的一个组成部分。本研究的目的是检查这一课程要求的价值,包括出版率和学员研究的潜在障碍。
向自强制性研究要求引入以来(2005-2011 年)接受培训的 116 名放射肿瘤学家/受训者发送了一份在线调查。问题涉及研究主题、出版物、随后的研究活动、对研究障碍的看法以及在培训期间进行研究的辅助手段。通过作者姓名在 PubMed 上进行了一次基于网络的搜索,以完成和验证出版统计数据。
共有 20 个中心的 116 名受训者中的 108 名(93.1%)提交了他们的研究论文给放射肿瘤学教师研究委员会,他们第一次成功地达到了所需的标准。其中一半的受训者最终在同行评审期刊上发表了他们的论文。在接受调查的受训者中,62%的人在科学会议上展示了他们的研究。大多数研究要么是回顾性的(62.3%),要么是剂量学/物理学项目(10.1%)。进行项目时遇到的主要问题是临床任务竞争激烈,缺乏专门的研究时间。值得注意的是,冗长的伦理审批程序、缺乏监督和项目统计支持并不被认为是障碍。
这一强制性研究要求确保受训者在培训期间至少启动并完成一个项目。自该课程组成部分引入以来,一半的研究项目已在同行评审期刊上发表。增加“受保护的时间”和培训科学写作和方法可能会提高出版率和质量。对澳大利亚和新西兰放射肿瘤学受训者研究要求的首次审查突出了需要进一步解决的问题,以进一步支持和培养初级放射肿瘤学家的研究文化。