Suppr超能文献

患者如何接受疟疾治疗:关于抗疟药物依从性的文献系统综述

How patients take malaria treatment: a systematic review of the literature on adherence to antimalarial drugs.

作者信息

Bruxvoort Katia, Goodman Catherine, Kachur S Patrick, Schellenberg David

机构信息

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom ; Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 20;9(1):e84555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084555. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High levels of patient adherence to antimalarial treatment are important in ensuring drug effectiveness. To achieve this goal, it is important to understand levels of patient adherence, and the range of study designs and methodological challenges involved in measuring adherence and interpreting results. Since antimalarial adherence was reviewed in 2004, there has been a major expansion in the use of artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) in the public sector, as well as initiatives to make them more widely accessible through community health workers and private retailers. These changes and the large number of recent adherence studies raise the need for an updated review on this topic.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting quantitative results on patient adherence to antimalarials obtained for treatment.

RESULTS

The 55 studies identified reported extensive variation in patient adherence to antimalarials, with many studies reporting very high adherence (90-100%) and others finding adherence of less than 50%. We identified five overarching approaches to assessing adherence based on the definition of adherence and the methods used to measure it. Overall, there was no clear pattern in adherence results by approach. However, adherence tended to be higher among studies where informed consent was collected at the time of obtaining the drug, where patient consultations were directly observed by research staff, and where a diagnostic test was obtained.

CONCLUSION

Variations in reported adherence may reflect factors related to patient characteristics and the nature of their consultation with the provider, as well as methodological variations such as interaction between the research team and patients before and during the treatment. Future studies can benefit from an awareness of the impact of study procedures on adherence outcomes, and the identification of improved measurement methods less dependent on self-report.

摘要

背景

患者对抗疟治疗的高依从性对于确保药物疗效至关重要。为实现这一目标,了解患者的依从水平以及测量依从性和解释结果所涉及的研究设计范围和方法学挑战很重要。自2004年对抗疟依从性进行综述以来,公共部门基于青蒿素的联合疗法(ACTs)的使用有了大幅扩展,同时也有通过社区卫生工作者和私人零售商使其更广泛可得的举措。这些变化以及近期大量的依从性研究增加了对该主题进行更新综述的必要性。

目的

我们对报告了治疗中患者对抗疟药依从性定量结果的研究进行了系统综述。

结果

纳入的55项研究报告了患者对抗疟药依从性的广泛差异,许多研究报告依从性非常高(90 - 100%),而其他研究发现依从性低于50%。我们根据依从性的定义和测量方法确定了五种评估依从性的总体方法。总体而言,按方法分类的依从性结果没有明显模式。然而,在获取药物时收集知情同意、研究人员直接观察患者咨询以及进行诊断检测的研究中,依从性往往更高。

结论

报告的依从性差异可能反映了与患者特征及其与提供者咨询性质相关的因素,以及诸如研究团队与患者在治疗前和治疗期间的互动等方法学差异。未来的研究可以从了解研究程序对依从性结果的影响以及确定较少依赖自我报告的改进测量方法中受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4e4/3896377/3ea52c23b379/pone.0084555.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验