Suppr超能文献

患者对知情同意的观点:腕管手术的前瞻性研究。

Patients' point of view on informed consent: a prospective study in carpal tunnel surgery.

作者信息

Fusetti Cesare, Lazzaro Mario, Trobia Massimo, Lucchina Stefano, Petri John, Garavaglia Guido

机构信息

Hand Surgery Unit, Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, ORBV-EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland.

出版信息

Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2013 Dec;42(12):E111-5.

Abstract

Patients' perception of consent form (CF) is not well known and many patients tend to view the CF as an administrative act. As part of a prospective study, a questionnaire was sent to 188 consecutive patients within 1 month after carpal tunnel release. Questions focused on patients' recall about risks, benefits, alternative options, preferences about decisions process and global satisfaction with CF. Patient's understanding of the legal consequences of the CF was analysed. Risk's recall rate was 59%. CF reduced preoperative anxiety in 65% and the influence in patients' decision was relevant in 55% of cases. Patients have limited understanding of the legal consequences of the consensus and 29% of patients believed that primary function was to protect hospital. Ten percent believed that CF expunges patients' right to compensation in case of claims. Patient involvement in medical decision-making is a key aspect of patient centred care. A substantial uncertainty exists about legal implication of CF, leading to potential discord.

摘要

患者对同意书(CF)的认知情况尚不清楚,许多患者倾向于将同意书视为一种行政行为。作为一项前瞻性研究的一部分,在腕管松解术后1个月内,向188例连续就诊的患者发放了问卷。问题集中在患者对风险、益处、替代方案的回忆,对决策过程的偏好以及对同意书的总体满意度。分析了患者对同意书法律后果的理解。风险回忆率为59%。同意书使65%的患者术前焦虑减轻,在55%的病例中,同意书对患者决策有显著影响。患者对共识的法律后果理解有限,29%的患者认为同意书的主要作用是保护医院。10%的患者认为同意书会剥夺患者索赔时获得赔偿的权利。患者参与医疗决策是患者为中心的医疗护理的一个关键方面。关于同意书的法律含义存在很大的不确定性,这可能导致潜在的分歧。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验