Collins Benjamin, Stoner Julie A, Digoy G Paul
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, P.O. Box 26901 WP 1290, Oklahoma City, OK 73126-0901, United States.
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 800 NE 13th Street, Oklahoma City, OK 73190, United States.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Mar;78(3):423-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.11.034. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
There are no studies comparing the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in the same population of pediatric patients with lateral neck abscesses. This case series assesses the accuracy of the two imaging techniques.
One hundred and forty imaging studies (ultrasound n=39 or CT n=101) that were performed from 2005 to 2011 prior to incision and drainage of a lateral neck mass at a tertiary care academic institution were retrospectively reviewed. All children 0-18 years of age with lateral neck abscesses who underwent CT or ultrasound imaging prior to drainage were included. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of ultrasound and CT were determined as compared to the gold standard, incision and drainage of the suspected abscess.
In children undergoing incision and drainage, the prevalence of an abscess was 89%. Ultrasound has a high specificity (100%) but a low sensitivity (53%). The positive predictive value (96%) is high while the negative predictive value is low (16%), assuming a positive abscess prevalence of 0.9. In contrast, CT has low specificity (18%) but slightly higher sensitivity (68%) compared to ultrasound. Similar to ultrasound, CT had low negative (6%) and high positive (88%) predictive values.
This study demonstrates that ultrasound may be an equivalently sensitive and more specific diagnostic tool when compared to CT in the work-up of lateral neck abscesses in children. It is safe and effective in diagnosis when there is an undetermined probability of an abscess.
尚无研究在同一组患有颈部外侧脓肿的儿科患者中比较超声和计算机断层扫描的准确性。本病例系列评估这两种成像技术的准确性。
回顾性分析了2005年至2011年在一家三级医疗学术机构对颈部外侧肿块进行切开引流术前进行的140项成像研究(超声n = 39或CT n = 101)。纳入所有0至18岁在引流术前接受CT或超声成像检查的颈部外侧脓肿患儿。将超声和CT的敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值与金标准(对疑似脓肿进行切开引流)进行比较来确定。
在接受切开引流的儿童中,脓肿的患病率为89%。超声具有高特异性(100%)但低敏感性(53%)。假设脓肿阳性患病率为0.9,阳性预测值较高(96%)而阴性预测值较低(16%)。相比之下,CT特异性较低(18%),但与超声相比敏感性略高(68%)。与超声类似,CT的阴性预测值较低(6%)而阳性预测值较高(88%)。
本研究表明,在儿童颈部外侧脓肿的检查中,与CT相比,超声可能是一种同样敏感且更具特异性的诊断工具。在脓肿可能性不确定时,它在诊断中是安全有效的。