Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Department of Biomechanics in Sports, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Aug;23(8):1162-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.005. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
The purpose of this study was to investigate coactivation (CoA) testing as a clinical tool to monitor motor learning after latissimus dorsi tendon transfer.
We evaluated 20 patients clinically with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) outcomes scores, visual analog scale, active external rotation (aER), and isometric strength testing in abduction and external rotation. Measurements of aER were performed while the latissimus dorsi was activated in its new function of external rotation with concomitant activation (coactivation) of its native functions (adduction and extension). Bilateral surface electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded during aER measurements and the strength testing procedure (EMG activity ratio: with/without CoA). Patients were divided into two groups (excellent/good vs fair/poor) according to the results of the ASES and UCLA scores.
The mean follow-up was 57.8 ± 25.2 months. Subdivided by clinical scores, the superior outcome group lost aER with CoA, whereas the inferior outcome group gained aER (UCLA score: -2.2° ± 7.4° vs +4.3° ± 4.1°; P = .031). Patients with inferior outcomes in the ASES score showed higher latissimus dorsi EMG activity ratios (P = .027), suggesting an inadequate motor learning process. Isometric strength testing revealed that the latissimus dorsi transfer had significantly greater activity compared with the contralateral side (external rotation, P = .008; abduction, P = .006) but did not have comparable strength (external rotation, P = .017; abduction, P = .009).
Patients with inferior clinical results were more likely to be dependent on CoA to gain external rotation. Therefore, CoA testing may be used as a tool to evaluate the status of postoperative motor learning after latissimus dorsi transfer.
本研究旨在探讨协同激活(CoA)测试作为监测 Latissimus dorsi 肌腱转移后运动学习的临床工具的作用。
我们对 20 名患者进行了临床评估,采用美国肩肘外科医师协会(ASES)和加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)评分、视觉模拟评分、主动外旋(aER)和外展及外旋等距力量测试评估。在 Latissimus dorsi 以新的外旋功能被激活时,Latissimus dorsi 的固有功能(内收和伸展)同时被激活,测量 aER。在 aER 测量和力量测试过程中记录双侧表面肌电图(EMG)活动(EMG 活动比率:有 CoA/无 CoA)。根据 ASES 和 UCLA 评分结果,患者分为两组(优/良与差/可)。
平均随访时间为 57.8 ± 25.2 个月。根据临床评分,优效组的 aER 与 CoA 同时丧失,而疗效差的组的 aER 增加(UCLA 评分:-2.2°±7.4°比+4.3°±4.1°;P =.031)。ASES 评分疗效差的患者 Latissimus dorsi EMG 活动比率更高(P =.027),表明运动学习过程不足。等距力量测试显示,Latissimus dorsi 转移的活动明显大于对侧(外旋,P =.008;外展,P =.006),但力量没有可比性(外旋,P =.017;外展,P =.009)。
临床疗效差的患者更依赖 CoA 来获得外旋。因此,CoA 测试可作为评估 Latissimus dorsi 转移后术后运动学习状态的工具。