Department of Pharmacotherapy and Outcomes Science, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Biostatistician, Center for Biostatistics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct;21(e2):e219-25. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002161. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
To determine the sensitivity and specificity of a dosing alert system for dosing errors and to compare the sensitivity of a proprietary system with and without institutional customization at a pediatric hospital.
A retrospective analysis of medication orders, orders causing dosing alerts, reported adverse drug events, and dosing errors during July, 2011 was conducted. Dosing errors with and without alerts were identified and the sensitivity of the system with and without customization was compared.
There were 47,181 inpatient pediatric orders during the studied period; 257 dosing errors were identified (0.54%). The sensitivity of the system for identifying dosing errors was 54.1% (95% CI 47.8% to 60.3%) if customization had not occurred and increased to 60.3% (CI 54.0% to 66.3%) with customization (p=0.02). The sensitivity of the system for underdoses was 49.6% without customization and 60.3% with customization (p=0.01). Specificity of the customized system for dosing errors was 96.2% (CI 96.0% to 96.3%) with a positive predictive value of 8.0% (CI 6.8% to 9.3). All dosing errors had an alert over-ridden by the prescriber and 40.6% of dosing errors with alerts were administered to the patient. The lack of indication-specific dose ranges was the most common reason why an alert did not occur for a dosing error.
Advances in dosing alert systems should aim to improve the sensitivity and positive predictive value of the system for dosing errors.
The dosing alert system had a low sensitivity and positive predictive value for dosing errors, but might have prevented dosing errors from reaching patients. Customization increased the sensitivity of the system for dosing errors.
确定一种给药错误剂量警报系统的灵敏度和特异性,并比较一家儿科医院中专用系统在有无机构定制情况下的灵敏度。
对 2011 年 7 月的药物医嘱、引起剂量警报的医嘱、报告的药物不良事件和剂量错误进行回顾性分析。识别有和无警报的剂量错误,并比较系统在有无定制情况下的灵敏度。
研究期间共有 47181 例住院儿科医嘱;确定了 257 例剂量错误(0.54%)。如果没有定制,该系统识别剂量错误的灵敏度为 54.1%(95%CI 47.8%至 60.3%),而定制后灵敏度增加到 60.3%(95%CI 54.0%至 66.3%)(p=0.02)。无定制时,系统低估剂量的灵敏度为 49.6%,定制后为 60.3%(p=0.01)。定制后剂量错误的系统特异性为 96.2%(96.0%至 96.3%),阳性预测值为 8.0%(6.8%至 9.3%)。所有剂量错误都被医嘱覆盖,40.6%带警报的剂量错误都给患者用了。最常见的原因是缺乏剂量特定的范围,导致剂量错误没有发出警报。
剂量警报系统的改进应旨在提高系统对剂量错误的灵敏度和阳性预测值。
该剂量警报系统对剂量错误的灵敏度和阳性预测值都较低,但可能防止剂量错误到达患者。定制增加了系统对剂量错误的灵敏度。