VA Office of Rural Health, Rural Health Resource Center - Central Region, Iowa City VA Healthcare System, 601 Hwy 6 West, Iowa City, IA, 52246, USA.
J Community Health. 2014 Apr;39(2):239-47. doi: 10.1007/s10900-014-9830-1.
Many people who live in rural areas face distance barriers to colonoscopy. Our previous study demonstrated the utility of mailing fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) to average risk patients overdue for colorectal cancer (CRC screening). The aims of this study were to determine if introductory and reminder telephone calls would increase the proportion of returned FITs as well as to compare costs. Average risk patients overdue for CRC screening received a high intensity intervention (HII), which included an introductory telephone call to see if they were interested in taking a FIT prior to mailing the test out and reminder phone calls if the FIT was not returned. This HII group was compared to our previous low intensity intervention (LII) where a FIT was mailed to a similar group of veterans with no telephone contact. While a higher proportion of eligible respondents returned FITs in the LII (92 vs. 45 %), there was a much higher proportion of FITs returned out of those mailed in the HII (85 vs. 14 %). The fewer wasted FITs in the HII led to it having lower cost per FIT returned ($27.43 vs. $44.86). Given that either intervention is a feasible approach for patients overdue for CRC screening, health care providers should consider offering FITs using a home-based mailing program along with other evidence-based CRC screening options to average risk patients. Factors such as location, patient population, FIT cost and reimbursement, and personnel costs need to be considered when deciding the most effective way to implement FIT screening.
许多居住在农村地区的人面临结肠镜检查的距离障碍。我们之前的研究表明,邮寄粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)给平均风险的、结直肠癌(CRC)筛查逾期的患者是有用的。本研究的目的是确定介绍性和提醒电话是否会增加返回的 FIT 的比例,并比较成本。CRC 筛查逾期的平均风险患者接受高强度干预(HII),包括在邮寄测试之前打介绍性电话,了解他们是否有兴趣进行 FIT,以及如果 FIT 未返回则打提醒电话。将 HII 组与我们之前的低强度干预(LII)进行比较,LII 向类似的退伍军人邮寄了 FIT,但没有电话联系。虽然 LII 中有更多符合条件的受访者返回了 FIT(92%比 45%),但 HII 中返回的 FIT 比例要高得多(85%比 14%)。HII 中浪费的 FIT 较少,导致其每返回一个 FIT 的成本更低(27.43 美元比 44.86 美元)。鉴于这两种干预措施都是 CRC 筛查逾期患者的可行方法,医疗保健提供者应考虑使用基于家庭的邮寄计划提供 FIT,并结合其他基于证据的 CRC 筛查选择,为平均风险患者提供服务。在决定实施 FIT 筛查的最有效方法时,需要考虑位置、患者人群、FIT 成本和报销以及人员成本等因素。