Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands,
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Mar;30(3):549-58. doi: 10.1007/s10554-014-0378-z. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
Accurate predictors of appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients are lacking. Both left atrial volume index (LAVI) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) have been proposed as prognostic markers in HCM patients. The specific value of LAVI and GLS to predict appropriate ICD therapy in high-risk HCM patients was studied. LAVI and 2-dimensional speckle tracking-derived GLS were assessed in 92 HCM patients undergoing ICD implantation (69 % men, mean age 50 ± 14 years). During long-term follow-up, appropriate ICD therapies, defined as antitachycardia pacing and/or shock for ventricular arrhythmia, were recorded. Appropriate ICD therapy occurred in 21 patients (23 %) during a median follow-up of 4.7 (2.2-8.2) years. Multivariate analysis revealed LAVI (p = 0.03) and GLS (p = 0.04) to be independent predictors of appropriate ICD therapy. Both LAVI and GLS showed higher accuracy to predict appropriate ICD therapy compared to presence of ≥1 conventional sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk factor(s) [area under the curve 0.76 (95 % CI 0.65-0.87) and 0.65 (95 % CI 0.54-0.77) versus 0.52 (95 % CI 0.43-0.58) respectively, p < 0.001]. No patient with both LAVI <34 mL/m(2) and GLS <-14 % experienced appropriate ICD therapy. Assessment of both LAVI and GLS on top of conventional SCD risk factors provided incremental clinical predictive value for appropriate ICD therapy, as shown by likelihood ratio test (p < 0.001) and integrated discrimination improvement index (0.17, p < 0.001). LAVI and GLS provide high negative predictive value for appropriate ICD therapy in high-risk HCM patients. Additionally to conventional SCD risk factors, both parameters may be useful to optimize criteria and timing for ICD implantation in these patients.
在肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者中,缺乏准确预测合适的植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)治疗的方法。左心房容积指数(LAVI)和整体纵向应变(GLS)均已被提议作为 HCM 患者的预后标志物。研究了 LAVI 和 GLS 对高危 HCM 患者合适的 ICD 治疗的预测价值。在接受 ICD 植入的 92 例 HCM 患者中评估了 LAVI 和二维斑点追踪衍生的 GLS(69%为男性,平均年龄 50±14 岁)。在长期随访中,记录了定义为室性心律失常的抗心动过速起搏和/或电击的适当 ICD 治疗。在中位随访 4.7(2.2-8.2)年后,21 例患者(23%)发生了适当的 ICD 治疗。多变量分析显示 LAVI(p=0.03)和 GLS(p=0.04)是适当 ICD 治疗的独立预测因子。与存在≥1 种传统的心脏性猝死(SCD)危险因素相比,LAVI 和 GLS 均显示出更高的预测适当 ICD 治疗的准确性[曲线下面积分别为 0.76(95%CI 0.65-0.87)和 0.65(95%CI 0.54-0.77)与 0.52(95%CI 0.43-0.58),p<0.001]。没有 LAVI<34 mL/m2 和 GLS<-14%的患者经历适当的 ICD 治疗。与传统的 SCD 危险因素相比,LAVI 和 GLS 的评估为适当的 ICD 治疗提供了增量的临床预测价值,这通过似然比检验(p<0.001)和综合判别改善指数(0.17,p<0.001)得到证明。LAVI 和 GLS 对高危 HCM 患者的适当 ICD 治疗具有较高的阴性预测价值。除了传统的 SCD 危险因素外,这两个参数可能有助于优化这些患者的 ICD 植入标准和时机。