Busigny Thomas, Van Belle Goedele, Jemel Boutheina, Hosein Anthony, Joubert Sven, Rossion Bruno
Institute of Research in Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Université de Toulouse, UPS, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition (CNRS, Cerco), Toulouse, France.
Institute of Research in Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Apr;56:312-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.01.018. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
Recent studies have provided solid evidence for pure cases of prosopagnosia following brain damage. The patients reported so far have posterior lesions encompassing either or both the right inferior occipital cortex and fusiform gyrus, and exhibit a critical impairment in generating a sufficiently detailed holistic percept to individualize faces. Here, we extended these observations to include the prosopagnosic patient LR (Bukach, Bub, Gauthier, & Tarr, 2006), whose damage is restricted to the anterior region of the right temporal lobe. First, we report that LR is able to discriminate parametrically defined individual exemplars of nonface object categories as accurately and quickly as typical observers, which suggests that the visual similarity account of prosopagnosia does not explain his impairments. Then, we show that LR does not present with the typical face inversion effect, whole-part advantage, or composite face effect and, therefore, has impaired holistic perception of individual faces. Moreover, the patient is more impaired at matching faces when the facial part he fixates is masked than when it is selectively revealed by means of gaze contingency. Altogether these observations support the view that the nature of the critical face impairment does not differ qualitatively across patients with acquired prosopagnosia, regardless of the localization of brain damage: all these patients appear to be impaired to some extent at what constitutes the heart of our visual expertise with faces, namely holistic perception at a sufficiently fine-grained level of resolution to discriminate exemplars of the face class efficiently. This conclusion raises issues regarding the existing criteria for diagnosis/classification of patients as cases of apperceptive or associative prosopagnosia.
近期研究为脑损伤后出现的单纯性面孔失认症提供了确凿证据。迄今为止报告的患者均有后部病变,累及右侧枕下回和梭状回中的一个或两个区域,并且在生成足够详细的整体感知以区分个体面孔方面表现出严重障碍。在此,我们将这些观察结果扩展至面孔失认症患者LR(Bukach、Bub、Gauthier和Tarr,2006年),其损伤局限于右侧颞叶前部区域。首先,我们报告LR能够像典型观察者一样准确、快速地辨别参数定义的非面孔物体类别的个体范例,这表明面孔失认症的视觉相似性解释无法说明他的障碍。然后,我们表明LR不存在典型的面孔倒置效应、整体-局部优势或合成面孔效应,因此对个体面孔的整体感知受损。此外,当患者注视的面部部分被遮挡时,其在面孔匹配方面的受损程度比通过注视偶然性选择性显示该部分时更严重。所有这些观察结果支持这样一种观点,即后天性面孔失认症患者的关键面孔损伤本质在质量上并无差异,无论脑损伤的定位如何:所有这些患者在构成我们面孔视觉专长核心的方面,即在足够精细的分辨率水平上进行整体感知以有效区分面孔类别的范例方面,似乎都在某种程度上存在损伤。这一结论引发了关于将患者诊断/分类为apperceptive或associative面孔失认症病例的现有标准问题。