Cinel Güzin, Kiper Nural, Pekcan Sevgi, Koyun Mustafa, Köse Mehmet, Çobanoğlu Nazan, Tana Aslan Ayşe, Yalçın Ebru, Doğru Deniz, Özçelik Uğur, Göçmen Ayhan
Division of Pediatric Chest Diseases, Department of Children's Health and Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Tuberk Toraks. 2013;61(4):320-6. doi: 10.5578/tt.3890.
Tuberculosis is still a global health problem all over the world despite its mortality has been decreased with effective treatment regimens. Poor treatment adherence, acquired drug resistance, treatment failure and relapse are the major problems during the course of the tuberculosis treatment. Intermittent regimens have the advantages of reducing the side effects and the cost of the therapy and increasing the adherence, especially in resource-limited areas; and have been documented to be as effective as daily regimen in the paediatric population. In this study, we compared the results of 6-month and 9-month intermittent-therapy regimens with two drugs, given to the children with pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis at our hospital.
One hundred and fifteen patients with pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis other than meningitis, who had been given intermittent anti-tuberculosis therapy between 1986 and 2001, were evaluated retrospectively. Fifty one patients were given isoniazid and rifampin daily for 15 days, followed by the same drugs and doses twice weekly for a total of 9-months. Also, 64 patients were treated with the same regimen for a total of 6-months.
Clinical recovery was observed in 75% and 79% of pulmonary tuberculosis patients at the first month of therapy in group 1 (9-month group) and group 2 (6-month group), respectively. Radiological recovery was noted between 0-6 months in 81% of the patients in group 1 and 86% of the patients in group 2. According to the clinical and radiological recovery times, no significant difference was detected between the two groups (p> 0.05). Similar results had been observed in extrapulmonary tuberculosis (p> 0.05). Follow-up periods ranged from 7 months to 15 years. There was no case of early relapse. Late relapse was noted in 4 patients, who had been received 9-month therapy (group 1).
Six-month intermittent therapy with two drugs is as efficacious as 9-month intermittent-therapy in childhood pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis, other than meningitis.
尽管有效治疗方案已降低了结核病死亡率,但它仍是全球范围内的一个健康问题。治疗依从性差、获得性耐药、治疗失败和复发是结核病治疗过程中的主要问题。间歇治疗方案具有减少副作用和治疗费用以及提高依从性的优点,尤其在资源有限地区;并且已证明在儿科人群中与每日治疗方案一样有效。在本研究中,我们比较了在我院对患有肺结核和肺外结核的儿童给予两种药物的6个月和9个月间歇治疗方案的结果。
回顾性评估了1986年至2001年间接受间歇抗结核治疗的115例非脑膜炎的肺结核和肺外结核患者。51例患者每日给予异烟肼和利福平15天,然后相同药物和剂量每周两次,共9个月。另外,64例患者接受相同方案治疗共6个月。
第1组(9个月组)和第2组(6个月组)中,分别有75%和79%的肺结核患者在治疗第1个月时临床症状改善。第1组81%的患者和第2组86%的患者在0至6个月间影像学表现改善。根据临床和影像学改善时间,两组间未检测到显著差异(p>0.05)。肺外结核患者也观察到类似结果(p>0.05)。随访期为7个月至15年。无早期复发病例。4例接受9个月治疗的患者(第1组)出现晚期复发。
对于儿童肺结核和肺外结核(非脑膜炎),两种药物的6个月间歇治疗与9个月间歇治疗同样有效。