Edkins Renee E, Cairns Bruce A, Hultman C Scott
From the *Division of Plastic Surgery, and †NC Jaycee Burn Center, University of North Carolina Health Care System, Chapel Hill, NC.
Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Mar;72(3):285-8. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000106.
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education mandated work-hour restrictions have negatively impacted many areas of clinical care, including management of burn patients, who require intensive monitoring, resuscitation, and procedural interventions. As surgery residents become less available to meet service needs, new models integrating advanced practice providers (APPs) into the burn team must emerge. We performed a systematic review of APPs in critical care questioning, how best to use all providers to solve these workforce challenges?
We performed a systematic review of PubMed, CINAHL, Ovid, and Google Scholar, from 2002 to 2012, using the key words: nurse practitioner, physician assistant, critical care, and burn care. After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, 18 relevant articles were selected for review. In addition, throughput and financial models were developed to examine provider staffing patterns.
Advanced practice providers in critical care settings function in various models, both with and without residents, reporting to either an intensivist or an attending physician. When APPs participated, patient outcomes were similar or improved compared across provider models. Several studies reported considerable cost-savings due to decrease length of stay, decreased ventilator days, and fewer urinary tract infections when nurse practitioners were included in the provider mix.
Restrictions in resident work-hours and changing health care environments require that new provider models be created for acute burn care. This article reviews current utilization of APPs in critical care units and proposes a new provider model for burn centers.
研究生医学教育认证委员会规定的工作时间限制对临床护理的许多领域都产生了负面影响,包括烧伤患者的管理,这类患者需要密切监测、复苏和程序性干预。由于外科住院医师难以满足服务需求,必须出现将高级实践提供者(APPs)纳入烧伤治疗团队的新模式。我们对重症监护中APPs的应用进行了系统综述,探讨如何最好地利用所有提供者来应对这些劳动力挑战?
我们对2002年至2012年期间的PubMed、CINAHL、Ovid和谷歌学术进行了系统综述,使用的关键词为:执业护士、医师助理、重症监护和烧伤护理。在应用纳入/排除标准后,选择了18篇相关文章进行综述。此外,还开发了通量和财务模型来研究提供者的人员配置模式。
重症监护环境中的高级实践提供者以各种模式发挥作用,有住院医师参与和无住院医师参与,向重症监护医师或主治医师汇报工作。当APPs参与时,不同提供者模式下的患者结局相似或有所改善。几项研究报告称,由于住院时间缩短、呼吸机使用天数减少以及在提供者组合中纳入执业护士后尿路感染减少,节省了大量成本。
住院医师工作时间的限制和不断变化的医疗环境要求为急性烧伤护理创建新的提供者模式。本文综述了目前APPs在重症监护病房的应用情况,并为烧伤中心提出了一种新的提供者模式。