Suppr超能文献

在初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中,决定导丝至球囊时间的是术者的操作量而非经验年限。

Operator's procedure volume and not years of experience, determine needle to balloon time in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

作者信息

Ahmed Imdad, Pancholy Samir B

机构信息

The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, Scranton, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov 15;84(6):943-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25428. Epub 2014 Feb 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed at evaluating operator and procedural variables affecting needle to balloon time in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND

The relationship between operator's variables with needle to balloon time is unknown.

METHODS

A total of 399 consecutive patients from 06/2010 to 03/2012 presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction in a community medical center were included in the study. Operator experience was calculated in number of years in interventional practice and operator procedure volume in number of percutaneous coronary intervention procedures performed annually. The time of arrival was divided into regular hours (7 am to 4 pm) and off hours (4 pm to 7 am) on weekdays and the entire duration on weekends and holidays.

RESULTS

The average patient age was 65 years and 59% were males. The mean needle to balloon time was 18.53 ± 8 min. There was no difference in needle to balloon time between patients presenting during regular hours compared to those presenting during off hours (18.19 ± 6.88 vs. 18.93 ± 9.13, P > 0.5). Operator experience (coefficient = -0.10, P = 0.03) and procedure volume (coefficient = -0.63, P < 0.0001) showed negative correlation with needle to balloon time. In multivariate analysis after adjusting for access sites and operator experience, procedure volume was the only independent predictor of needle to balloon time (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Operator procedure volume and not the years of experience, determine the needle to balloon time in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Operator performance as assessed by needle to balloon time is not affected by the time of the day.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中影响穿刺至球囊扩张时间的术者及操作变量。

背景

术者变量与穿刺至球囊扩张时间之间的关系尚不清楚。

方法

纳入2010年6月至2012年3月在一家社区医疗中心连续就诊的399例ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者。术者经验以介入实践年限计算,术者手术量以每年进行的经皮冠状动脉介入手术例数计算。将到达时间分为工作日的正常时间(上午7点至下午4点)和非工作时间(下午4点至上午7点)以及周末和节假日的全天时间。

结果

患者平均年龄为65岁,59%为男性。平均穿刺至球囊扩张时间为18.53±8分钟。正常时间就诊的患者与非工作时间就诊的患者在穿刺至球囊扩张时间上无差异(18.19±6.88 vs. 18.93±9.13,P>0.5)。术者经验(系数=-0.10,P=0.03)和手术量(系数=-0.63,P<0.0001)与穿刺至球囊扩张时间呈负相关。在调整了穿刺部位和术者经验的多因素分析中,手术量是穿刺至球囊扩张时间的唯一独立预测因素(P<0.001)。

结论

在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,决定穿刺至球囊扩张时间的是术者手术量而非经验年限。通过穿刺至球囊扩张时间评估的术者表现不受一天中时间的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验