Geosyntec Consultants, Inc., 130 Research Lane, #2, Guelph, Ontario N1G 5G3, Canada.
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2014 Mar;16(3):491-500. doi: 10.1039/c3em00128h. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
Controlled laboratory experiments were conducted to demonstrate the use of passive samplers for soil vapor concentration monitoring. Five different passive samplers were studied (Radiello, SKC Ultra, Waterloo Membrane Sampler, ATD tubes and 3M OVM 3500). Ten different volatile organic compounds were used of varying classes (chlorinated ethanes, ethanes, and methanes, aliphatics and aromatics) and physical properties (vapor pressure, solubility and sorption). Samplers were exposed in randomized triplicates to concentrations of 1, 10 and 100 ppmv, with a relative humidity of ∼80%, a temperature of ∼24 °C, and a duration of 30 minutes in a chamber with a face velocity of about 5 cm min(-1). Passive samplers are more commonly used for longer sample durations (e.g., 8 hour workday) and higher face velocities (>600 cm min(-1)), so testing to verify the performance for these conditions was needed. Summa canister samples were collected and analyzed by EPA Method TO-15 to establish a baseline for comparison for all the passive samplers. Low-uptake rate varieties of four of the samplers were also tested at 10 ppmv under two conditions; with 5 cm min(-1) face velocity and stagnant conditions to assess whether low or near-zero face velocities would result in a low bias from the starvation effect. The results indicate that passive samplers can provide concentration measurements with accuracy (mostly within a factor of 2) and precision (RSD < 15%) comparable to conventional Summa canister samples and EPA Method TO-15 analysis. Some compounds are challenging for some passive samplers because of uncertainties in the uptake rates, or challenges with retention or recovery.
进行了受控实验室实验,以证明使用被动采样器进行土壤蒸气浓度监测的用途。研究了五种不同的被动采样器(Radiello、SKC Ultra、滑铁卢膜采样器、ATD 管和 3M OVM 3500)。使用了十种不同的挥发性有机化合物,这些化合物具有不同的类别(氯乙烷、乙烷和甲烷、脂肪族和芳香族)和物理性质(蒸气压、溶解度和吸附)。采样器在相对湿度约为 80%、温度约为 24°C、室中流速约为 5cmmin^(-1)的条件下,以 1、10 和 100ppm 的浓度进行了随机三次暴露,暴露时间为 30 分钟。被动采样器通常用于更长的采样时间(例如,8 小时工作日)和更高的流速(>600cmmin^(-1)),因此需要进行测试以验证这些条件下的性能。使用 EPA 方法 TO-15 收集和分析 Summa 罐样品,为所有被动采样器建立了比较的基准。还在两种条件下,在 10ppm 下测试了四种采样器的低吸收速率品种;使用 5cmmin^(-1)的流速和静止条件,以评估低或接近零的流速是否会导致因饥饿效应而产生低偏差。结果表明,被动采样器可以提供具有准确性(大多在 2 倍以内)和精密度(RSD<15%)的浓度测量结果,与传统的 Summa 罐样品和 EPA 方法 TO-15 分析相当。对于某些化合物,由于吸收速率存在不确定性,或者保留或回收方面存在挑战,某些被动采样器可能会遇到挑战。