Tan Sidhartha
NorthShore University Health System, University Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, 2650 Ridge Avenue, Evanston, IL 60201, USA.
Clin Perinatol. 2014 Mar;41(1):105-17. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
There is a certainty in malpractice cases that neurodevelopmental deficits are caused by preventable events at birth when the onset, nature, and timing of the insult in the antenatal and natal period are unknown. The biggest problem is determining timing. Electronic fetal monitoring is given excessive importance in legal cases. Before assigning fault on events at birth, a better understanding of developmental neurobiology and limitations of the present clinical biomarkers is warranted. The issues of single versus repeated episodes, timing of antenatal insults, pros and cons of legal arguments, interaction of various etiologic and anatomic factors are discussed.
在医疗事故案件中存在一种确定性,即当产前和出生时损伤的发作、性质和时间未知时,神经发育缺陷是由出生时可预防的事件引起的。最大的问题是确定时间。电子胎儿监护在法律案件中被过度重视。在判定出生时事件的过错之前,有必要更好地理解发育神经生物学以及当前临床生物标志物的局限性。本文讨论了单次发作与反复发 作、产前损伤的时间、法律论点的利弊、各种病因和解剖因素的相互作用等问题。