TransAnalytics, LLC; 336 West Broad Street, Quakertown, PA 18951, USA.
TransAnalytics, LLC; 336 West Broad Street, Quakertown, PA 18951, USA.
J Safety Res. 2014 Feb;48:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
A computer-based version of an established neuropsychological paper-and-pencil assessment tool, the Trail-Making Test, was applied with approximately 700 drivers aged 70 years and older in offices of the Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration.
This was a volunteer sample that received a small compensation for study participation, with an assurance that their license status would not be affected by the results. Analyses revealed that the study sample was representative of Maryland older drivers with respect to age and indices of prior driving safety. The relationship between drivers' scores on the Trail-Making Test and prospective crash experience was analyzed using a new outcome measure that explicitly takes into account error responses as well as correct responses, the error-compensated completion time.
For the only reliable predictor of crash risk, Trail-Making Test Part B, this measure demonstrated a modest gain in specificity and was a more significant predictor of future safety risk than the simple time-to-completion measure.
Improved specificity and the potential for autonomous test administration are particular advantages of this measure for use with large populations, in settings such as health care or driver licensing.
一种基于计算机的、已建立的神经心理学纸笔评估工具——连线测试(Trail-Making Test)的版本,已在马里兰州机动车管理局的办公室中应用于大约 700 名 70 岁及以上的驾驶员。
这是一个志愿者样本,他们因参与研究而获得少量报酬,并保证他们的驾照状态不会因结果而受到影响。分析表明,研究样本在年龄和先前驾驶安全指标方面与马里兰州的老年驾驶员具有代表性。使用一种新的结果衡量标准,该标准明确考虑了错误反应和正确反应,即错误补偿完成时间,分析了驾驶员在连线测试上的得分与预期碰撞经历之间的关系。
对于唯一可靠的碰撞风险预测指标——连线测试 B 部分,该衡量标准在特异性方面略有提高,并且比简单的完成时间衡量标准更能显著预测未来的安全风险。
这种衡量标准的特异性提高和自主测试管理的潜力是其在医疗保健或驾驶执照等环境中用于大量人群的特别优势。