Parks Connie L, Richard Adam H, Monson Keith L
Counterterrorism and Forensic Science Research Unit, Visiting Scientist Program, FBI Laboratory Division, 2501 Investigation Parkway, Quantico, VA 22135, USA.
Counterterrorism and Forensic Science Research Unit, FBI Laboratory Division, 2501 Investigation Parkway, Quantico, VA 22135, USA.
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Apr;237:146.e1-146.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.043. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
Facial approximation is the technique of developing a representation of the face from the skull of an unknown individual. Facial approximation relies heavily on average craniofacial soft tissue depths. For more than a century, researchers have employed a broad array of tissue depth collection methodologies, a practice which has resulted in a lack of standardization in craniofacial soft tissue depth research. To combat such methodological inconsistencies, Stephan and Simpson 2008 [15] examined and synthesized a large number of previously published soft tissue depth studies. Their comprehensive meta-analysis produced a pooled dataset of averaged tissue depths and a simplified methodology, which the researchers suggest be utilized as a minimum standard protocol for future craniofacial soft tissue depth research. The authors of the present paper collected craniofacial soft tissue depths using three-dimensional models generated from computed tomography scans of living males and females of four self-identified ancestry groups from the United States ranging in age from 18 to 62 years. This paper assesses the differences between: (i) the pooled mean tissue depth values from the sample utilized in this paper and those published by Stephan 2012 [21] and (ii) the mean tissue depth values of two demographically similar subsets of the sample utilized in this paper and those published by Rhine and Moore 1984 [16]. Statistical test results indicate that the tissue depths collected from the sample evaluated in this paper are significantly and consistently larger than those published by Stephan 2012 [21]. Although a lack of published variance data by Rhine and Moore 1984 [16] precluded a direct statistical assessment, a substantive difference was also concluded. Further, the dataset presented in this study is representative of modern American adults and is, therefore, appropriate for use in constructing contemporary facial approximations.
面部复原是根据未知个体的颅骨生成面部表征的技术。面部复原在很大程度上依赖于平均颅面软组织厚度。一个多世纪以来,研究人员采用了各种各样的组织厚度收集方法,这种做法导致颅面软组织厚度研究缺乏标准化。为了应对这种方法上的不一致,斯特凡和辛普森在2008年[15]对大量先前发表的软组织厚度研究进行了审查和综合分析。他们全面的荟萃分析得出了一个平均组织厚度的汇总数据集和一种简化方法,研究人员建议将其用作未来颅面软组织厚度研究的最低标准方案。本文的作者使用从美国四个自我认定的血统群体的18至62岁的在世男性和女性的计算机断层扫描生成的三维模型收集了颅面软组织厚度。本文评估了以下两者之间的差异:(i)本文所使用样本的汇总平均组织厚度值与斯特凡2012年[21]发表的值,以及(ii)本文所使用样本的两个人口统计学上相似的子集的平均组织厚度值与莱茵和摩尔1984年[16]发表的值。统计测试结果表明,本文评估的样本所收集的组织厚度明显且持续大于斯特凡2012年[21]发表的厚度。尽管莱茵和摩尔1984年[16]缺乏已发表的方差数据,无法进行直接的统计评估,但也得出了实质性差异。此外,本研究中呈现的数据集代表了现代美国成年人,因此适合用于构建当代面部复原。