Takhellambam Yumjaobabu Singh, Lourembam Sunil Singh, Sapam Opendro Singh, Kshetrimayum Raju Singh, Ningthoujam Bhubon Singh, Khan Tousif
Professor, Department of Surgery, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS) , Imphal, Manipur, India .
Junior Resident, Department of Surgery, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS) , Imphal, Manipur, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Dec;7(12):2847-50. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6493.3887. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
Breast cancer is the most common cancer of women worldwide and usually presents as lump in the breast. Ultrasonography and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) are two investigational tools often used to differentiate malignant breast lump from benign one. Aims and Objects: To find out and compare the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of ultrasonography and FNAC in diagnosing malignant breast lump.
Patients who presented with clinically palpable breast lump at the department of Surgery, RIMS, India, from September, 2010 to August, 2012, were included. Recurrent lumps, breast abscess and cystic breast lumps were excluded. All the patients underwent Ultrasonographic evaluation using 7.5 MHz probe (©SIEMENS, Sonoline Versa Plus) at the department of Radiodiagnosis, RIMS and FNAC at the department of Pathology, RIMS. All the patients underwent excision of the lumps and tissues were sent for Histopathological examination. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of ultrasonography and FNAC were calculated taking Histopathological result as the gold standard. Values were compared.
Sixty patients with 62 breast lumps (40 benign and 22 malignant) were included. FNAC reported 42 lumps as benign and 19 as malignant and was indeterminate in 1 case. Ultrasonography reported 36 cases as benign, 18 as malignant and 6 as indeterminate; it failed to detect breast lump in 2 cases. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of ultrasonography and FNAC in diagnosing malignant breast lump were respectively 94.74%, 100%, 100%, 97.22% and 90.48%, 100%, 100%, 95.24%.
Ultrasonography and FNAC are 100% specific in diagnosing malignant breast lesion. Although Ultrasonography appears more sensitive than FNAC, the percentage of indeterminate report is higher with Ultrasonography.
乳腺癌是全球女性中最常见的癌症,通常表现为乳房肿块。超声检查和细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)是常用于区分恶性乳房肿块与良性肿块的两种检查手段。目的:找出并比较超声检查和FNAC在诊断恶性乳房肿块方面的敏感性、特异性和预测价值。
纳入2010年9月至2012年8月期间在印度RIMS外科就诊的临床可触及乳房肿块患者。排除复发性肿块、乳房脓肿和囊性乳房肿块。所有患者在RIMS放射诊断科使用7.5MHz探头(©西门子,Sonoline Versa Plus)进行超声评估,并在RIMS病理科进行FNAC检查。所有患者均接受肿块切除术,组织送检进行组织病理学检查。以组织病理学结果为金标准计算超声检查和FNAC的敏感性、特异性和预测价值。对各项数值进行比较。
纳入60例患者的62个乳房肿块(40个良性,22个恶性)。FNAC报告42个肿块为良性,19个为恶性,1例结果不确定。超声检查报告36例为良性,18例为恶性,6例结果不确定;2例未检测到乳房肿块。超声检查和FNAC在诊断恶性乳房肿块方面的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为94.74%、100%、100%、97.22%和90.48%、100%、100%、95.24%。
超声检查和FNAC在诊断恶性乳房病变方面特异性均为100%。虽然超声检查似乎比FNAC更敏感,但超声检查结果不确定报告的比例更高。