1 Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, Republic of Korea.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Mar;202(3):W254-62. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11015.
The purpose of this article is to retrospectively evaluate the utility of diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) at 3 T in differentiating central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Eighty consecutive patients (57 with central gland cancer and 23 without central gland cancer) were included in this study. All patients underwent T2-weighted imaging and DTI at 3 T, followed by surgery. For predicting central gland cancer, experienced and less-experienced radiologists independently analyzed T2-weighted imaging and combined T2-weighted imaging and DTI, respectively. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) values were measured for central gland cancers and BPH foci of stromal and glandular hyperplasia. Statistical analyses were performed using McNemar test, linear mixed model, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and kappa statistics.
For predicting central gland cancers, the area under the curve (Az) of combined T2-weighted imaging and DTI for the experienced (0.915) and less-experienced reader (0.753) was superior to that of T2-weighted imaging (0.723 vs 0.664; p<0.001). The mean ADC and FA values were 0.77×10(-3) mm2/s and 0.35, respectively, for central gland cancers, 1.22×10(-3) mm2/s and 0.26, respectively, for stromal hyperplasia foci, and 1.59×10(-3) mm2/s and 0.21, respectively, for glandular hyperplasia foci, and the values differed significantly. For differentiating central gland cancer from stromal hyperplasia foci and glandular hyperplasia foci, Az values of ADC versus FA were 0.989 and 1.0 versus 0.818 and 0.916, respectively, and the difference was statistically different.
DTI at 3 T is useful for distinguishing central gland cancers from BPH foci, with significantly different ADC and FA values. Furthermore, ADC showed greater diagnostic accuracy than FA in differentiating central gland cancers from stromal and glandular hyperplasia foci.
本文旨在回顾性评估 3T 扩散张量成像(DTI)在区分中央腺体前列腺癌与良性前列腺增生(BPH)中的作用。
本研究纳入 80 例连续患者(57 例中央腺体癌和 23 例无中央腺体癌)。所有患者均在 3T 下行 T2 加权成像和 DTI 检查,随后进行手术。为了预测中央腺体癌,有经验和经验较少的放射科医生分别独立分析 T2 加权成像和 T2 加权成像与 DTI 相结合的结果。测量中央腺体癌和基质及腺体增生的 BPH 病灶的表观扩散系数(ADC)和各向异性分数(FA)值。采用 McNemar 检验、线性混合模型、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和 Kappa 统计分析进行统计学分析。
对于预测中央腺体癌,有经验(0.915)和经验较少的读者(0.753)联合 T2 加权成像和 DTI 的曲线下面积(Az)均优于 T2 加权成像(0.723 比 0.664;p<0.001)。中央腺体癌的平均 ADC 和 FA 值分别为 0.77×10(-3)mm2/s 和 0.35,基质增生病灶分别为 1.22×10(-3)mm2/s 和 0.26,腺体增生病灶分别为 1.59×10(-3)mm2/s 和 0.21,差异有统计学意义。在区分中央腺体癌与基质增生病灶和腺体增生病灶时,ADC 与 FA 的 Az 值分别为 0.989 和 1.0,而与 0.818 和 0.916 相比,差异有统计学意义。
3T 弥散张量成像(DTI)有助于区分中央腺体癌与 BPH 病灶,ADC 和 FA 值有显著差异。此外,在区分中央腺体癌与基质和腺体增生病灶时,ADC 的诊断准确性优于 FA。