Siemons Liseth, Vonkeman Harald E, ten Klooster Peter M, van Riel Piet L C M, van de Laar Mart A F J
Department of Psychology, Health & Technology; Arthritis Center Twente, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500, AE, Enschede, The Netherlands,
Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Jun;33(6):783-9. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2538-x. Epub 2014 Feb 23.
This paper aims to examine the interchangeability of the disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and DAS28-CRP scores in a diverse sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and to evaluate generalizability over gender, age, and disease duration. A sample of 682 patients was drawn from the DREAM registry. Agreement between the two DAS28 scores was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland Altman plots, and a matrix of classification agreement over DAS28 disease activity categories. Despite a strong linear correlation between the DAS28 scores and a high ICC value of 0.931, a considerable lack of individual agreement could be observed, with Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement ranging between -0.85 and +1.25 points. On average, DAS28-CRP scores were 0.20 points lower than DAS28-ESR scores, and data stratification on age and gender showed that this systematic bias was most severe in older women (0.39 points). The overall classification agreement across DAS28 categories was 76.69%, with the agreement being lowest (35.37%) in the low disease activity group. Patients were more easily classified as being in remission when using the DAS28-CRP measure. DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP scores are not interchangeable within individuals. The DAS28-CRP tends to yield lower values of disease activity than the DAS28-ESR, resulting in substantial classification differences.
本文旨在研究28个关节疾病活动评分(DAS28)-红细胞沉降率(ESR)和DAS28- C反应蛋白(CRP)评分在类风湿关节炎(RA)患者不同样本中的互换性,并评估其在性别、年龄和病程方面的普遍性。从DREAM注册库中抽取了682例患者样本。使用组内相关系数(ICC)、Bland Altman图以及DAS28疾病活动类别分类一致性矩阵分析了两种DAS28评分之间的一致性。尽管DAS28评分之间存在很强的线性相关性且ICC值高达0.931,但仍可观察到个体一致性存在相当大的不足,Bland - Altman 95%一致性界限在-0.85至+1.25分之间。平均而言,DAS28 - CRP评分比DAS28 - ESR评分低0.20分,按年龄和性别进行数据分层显示,这种系统偏差在老年女性中最为严重(0.39分)。DAS28各类别之间的总体分类一致性为76.69%,在低疾病活动组中一致性最低(35.37%)。使用DAS28 - CRP测量时,患者更容易被归类为缓解状态。DAS28 - ESR和DAS28 - CRP评分在个体内不可互换。DAS28 - CRP往往比DAS28 - ESR产生更低的疾病活动值,导致显著的分类差异。