Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Turku, Finland; School of Bioscience, University of Skövde, Sweden.
Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Turku, Finland; School of Bioscience, University of Skövde, Sweden.
Conscious Cogn. 2014 Apr;25:51-66. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.01.011. Epub 2014 Feb 22.
We investigated whether inconsistencies in previous studies regarding emotional experiences in dreams derive from whether dream emotions are self-rated or externally evaluated. Seventeen subjects were monitored with polysomnography in the sleep laboratory and awakened from every rapid eye movement (REM) sleep stage 5 min after the onset of the stage. Upon awakening, participants gave an oral dream report and rated their dream emotions using the modified Differential Emotions Scale, whereas external judges rated the participants' emotions expressed in the dream reports, using the same scale. The two approaches produced diverging results. Self-ratings, as compared to external ratings, resulted in greater estimates of (a) emotional dreams; (b) positively valenced dreams; (c) positive and negative emotions per dream; and (d) various discrete emotions represented in dreams. The results suggest that this is mostly due to the underrepresentation of positive emotions in dream reports. Possible reasons for this discrepancy are discussed.
我们研究了先前关于梦境中情绪体验的研究结果不一致是否源于梦境情绪是自我评估还是外部评估。17 名被试在睡眠实验室接受多导睡眠图监测,并在每个快速眼动(REM)睡眠阶段开始后 5 分钟从该阶段中唤醒。醒来后,参与者口头报告梦境,并使用改良的差异情绪量表(modified Differential Emotions Scale)对其梦境情绪进行自我评估,而外部评判者则使用相同的量表评估参与者在梦境报告中表达的情绪。这两种方法产生了不同的结果。与外部评估相比,自我评估结果表明:(a)情绪梦更多;(b)正面情绪梦更多;(c)每个梦境中的积极和消极情绪更多;以及(d)梦中表现出的各种离散情绪更多。研究结果表明,这主要是由于梦境报告中正面情绪的代表性不足。对于这种差异,讨论了可能的原因。