Suppr超能文献

苏格兰结直肠癌报告情况调查:指南遵循情况和报告表式报告的影响。

A survey of reporting of colorectal cancer in Scotland: compliance with guidelines and effect of proforma reporting.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.

NHS Information Services Division, National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Pathol. 2014 Jun;67(6):499-505. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2013-202060. Epub 2014 Feb 24.

Abstract

AIMS

The main purpose of the study was to present a baseline audit of reporting of colorectal cancers resection specimens in Scotland, audited against the Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) standards (2007) and NHS Quality Improvement Scotland (NHS QIS) standards.

METHODS

50 consecutive rectal and 50 consecutive colonic cancer cases from 2011 were audited from 10 Scottish health boards involved in colorectal cancer reporting (n=953). The rates of reporting of serosal involvement, extramural venous invasion (EMVI) and the mean numbers of lymph nodes found were audited against RCPath standards and compared between units that routinely used a reporting proforma versus those that did not.

RESULTS

The performance in reporting of rectal cancer was generally worse than for colonic cancer, with only three units meeting the RCPath standards for reporting of rectal cancer. There were significant differences between units that routinely used a proforma, with the non-proforma group failing to meet the minimum standards for both serosal involvement (6%) and EMVI (24%). In the non-proforma group, 56% of rectal cases had a mean lymph node count of 12 or more compared with 81% in the proforma group.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences exist in the frequencies with which important adverse prognostic features are reported by pathologists across 10 Scottish health boards. This has potential implications for patient care. Health boards that make routine use of reporting proformas are more likely to meet RCPath guidelines for reporting of these important pathological parameters.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是对苏格兰结直肠癌切除标本的报告进行基线审核,审核标准为皇家病理学院(RCPath)标准(2007 年)和苏格兰国家医疗服务体系质量改进署(NHS QIS)标准。

方法

从参与结直肠癌报告的 10 个苏格兰卫生委员会中抽取 2011 年连续 50 例直肠和 50 例结肠癌症病例(n=953)进行审核。根据 RCPath 标准审核浆膜浸润、外膜静脉侵犯(EMVI)和检出的平均淋巴结数量的报告率,并比较常规使用报告表格与不使用报告表格的单位之间的差异。

结果

直肠癌的报告表现普遍差于结肠癌,只有三个单位符合 RCPath 直肠癌报告标准。常规使用表格的单位之间存在显著差异,非表格组在浆膜浸润(6%)和 EMVI(24%)方面均未达到最低标准。在非表格组中,56%的直肠病例平均淋巴结计数为 12 个或更多,而表格组为 81%。

结论

10 个苏格兰卫生委员会的病理学家报告重要预后不良特征的频率存在显著差异。这对患者护理有潜在影响。常规使用报告表格的卫生委员会更有可能符合 RCPath 对这些重要病理参数报告的指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验