Logopaedic and Audiological Sciences, Gent University, Ghent, Belgium,
Arch Sex Behav. 2014 Aug;43(6):1159-63. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0262-x. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
The present study examined the popular stereotype that gay men lisp by evaluating to what extent listeners associated dental or frontal articulation/lisping with gayness. Fifteen heterosexual males and 15 heterosexual females listened to 275 samples of read speech and judged the sexual orientation of the speakers. A total of 175 of the samples were of homosexual men, 74 (42.3 %) of which had been identified with lisping in a previous study; 100 were of heterosexual men, 18 (18 %) of which had been identified with lisping previously. Based on the ratings of the listeners of the present study, lisping speakers were significantly more often judged to be homosexual. This was true for the group as a whole as well as for the subgroup of homosexual and heterosexual men separately. Furthermore, there was no significant gender difference with respect to associating lisping with gayness. Male and female judges associated lisping with gayness to a similar degree. Additional analysis showed that overall 56.2 % of the time the judges were correct in their judgment of the speakers' sexual orientation. The results of this study confirmed previous preliminary findings that suggested that frontal or dental articulation/lisping is a feature that listeners associate with gayness. The reason for this association remains to be clarified.
本研究通过评估听众将牙齿或前部发音/口齿不清与同性恋联系起来的程度,检验了同性恋者口齿不清的普遍刻板印象。15 名异性恋男性和 15 名异性恋女性听取了 275 个朗读样本,并判断了说话者的性取向。总共 175 个样本是同性恋男性,其中 74 个(42.3%)在之前的研究中被确定为口齿不清;100 个是异性恋男性,其中 18 个(18%)在之前的研究中被确定为口齿不清。根据本研究听众的评价,口齿不清的说话者被明显更多地判断为同性恋者。这对整个群体以及同性恋和异性恋男性的子群体都是如此。此外,在将口齿不清与同性恋联系起来方面,没有明显的性别差异。男性和女性评判者在将口齿不清与同性恋联系起来的程度上没有显著差异。进一步的分析表明,总体而言,评判者在判断说话者的性取向时,有 56.2%的时间是正确的。本研究的结果证实了之前的初步发现,即前部或牙齿发音/口齿不清是听众与同性恋联系起来的一个特征。这种联系的原因尚待澄清。