Human Genome Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Haematology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia; School of Medicine, International Medical University, 57000, Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Biomed Pharmacother. 2014 Apr;68(3):343-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
The introduction and success of imatinib mesylate (IM) has become a paradigm shift in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment. However, the high efficacy of IM has been hampered by the issue of clinical resistance that might due to pharmacogenetic variability. In the current study, the contribution of three common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of ABCB1 (T1236C, G2677T/A and C3435T) and two SNPs of ABCG2 (G34A and C421A) genes in mediating resistance and/or good response among 215 CML patients on IM therapy were investigated. Among these patients, the frequency distribution of ABCG2 421 CC, CA and AA genotypes were significantly different between IM good response and resistant groups (P=0.01). Resistance was significantly associated with patients who had homozygous ABCB1 1236 CC genotype with OR 2.79 (95%CI: 1.217-6.374, P=0.01). For ABCB1 G2677T/A polymorphism, a better complete cytogenetic remission was observed for patients with variant TT/AT/AA genotype, compared to other genotype groups (OR=0.48, 95%CI: 0.239-0.957, P=0.03). Haplotype analysis revealed that ABCB1 haplotypes (C1236G2677C3435) was statistically linked to higher risk to IM resistance (25.8% vs. 17.4%, P=0.04), while ABCG2 diplotype A34A421 was significantly correlated with IM good response (9.1% vs. 3.9%, P=0.03). In addition, genotypic variant in ABCG2 421C>A was associated with a major molecular response (MMR) (OR=2.20, 95%CI: 1.273-3.811, P=0.004), whereas ABCB1 2677G>T/A variant was associated with a significantly lower molecular response (OR=0.49, 95%CI: 0.248-0.974, P=0.04). However, there was no significant correlation of these SNPs with IM intolerance and IM induced hepatotoxicity. Our results suggest the usefulness of genotyping of these single nucleotide polymorphisms in predicting IM response among CML patients.
甲氨蝶呤(IM)的引入和成功已成为慢性髓性白血病(CML)治疗的典范转变。然而,IM 的高效性受到临床耐药性问题的阻碍,这可能是由于药物遗传学的可变性。在目前的研究中,研究了三个常见的 ABCB1 单核苷酸多态性(SNP)(T1236C、G2677T/A 和 C3435T)和 ABCG2 两个 SNP(G34A 和 C421A)基因在介导 215 例接受 IM 治疗的 CML 患者的耐药性和/或良好反应中的作用。在这些患者中,ABCG2 421 CC、CA 和 AA 基因型的频率分布在 IM 反应良好和耐药组之间有显著差异(P=0.01)。耐药性与纯合子 ABCB1 1236 CC 基因型的患者显著相关,OR 为 2.79(95%CI:1.217-6.374,P=0.01)。对于 ABCB1 G2677T/A 多态性,与其他基因型组相比,具有变异 TT/AT/AA 基因型的患者观察到更好的完全细胞遗传学缓解(OR=0.48,95%CI:0.239-0.957,P=0.03)。单倍型分析显示,ABCB1 单倍型(C1236G2677C3435)与更高的 IM 耐药风险相关(25.8% vs. 17.4%,P=0.04),而 ABCG2 二倍型 A34A421 与 IM 反应良好显著相关(9.1% vs. 3.9%,P=0.03)。此外,ABCG2 421C>A 基因型与主要分子反应(MMR)相关(OR=2.20,95%CI:1.273-3.811,P=0.004),而 ABCB1 2677G>T/A 变体与显著较低的分子反应相关(OR=0.49,95%CI:0.248-0.974,P=0.04)。然而,这些 SNP 与 IM 不耐受和 IM 诱导的肝毒性之间没有显著相关性。我们的结果表明,在 CML 患者中,对这些单核苷酸多态性进行基因分型有助于预测 IM 反应。