Ronde-Oustau C, Diesinger Y, Jenny J-Y, Antoni M, Gaudias J, Boeri C, Sibilia J, Lessinger J-M
Service de rhumatologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
Centre de chirurgie orthopédique et de la main, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 10, avenue Baumann, 67400 Illkirch, France.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Apr;100(2):217-20. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.10.017. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
Periprosthetic joint infection often raises diagnostic challenges, as the published criteria are heterogeneous. New markers for predicting periprosthetic infection have been evaluated. Here, we assessed one of these markers, C-reactive protein (CRP), in joint fluid.
We hypothesised that intra-articular CRP levels would perform better than serum CRP concentrations in diagnosing knee prosthesis infection.
We prospectively included 30 patients including 10 with native-knee effusions, 11 with prosthetic-knee aseptic effusions, and 11 with prosthetic-knee infection defined using 2011 Musculoskeletal Society criteria. Serum CRP was assayed using turbidimetry or nephelometry and intra-articular CRP using nephelometry. Appropriate statistical tests were performed to compare the three groups; P values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Serum and intra-articular CRP levels were 5- to 16-fold higher in the group with periprosthetic infection than in the other two groups. Although the areas under the ROC curves were not significantly different, the likelihood ratios associated with the selected cut-offs suggested superiority of intra-articular CRP: a value > 2.78 mg/L suggested possible infection (100% sensitivity and 82% specificity) and a value > 5.37 mg/L probable infection (90% sensitivity and 91% specificity).
Our findings suggest a possible role for intra-articular CRP assay in diagnosing knee prosthesis infection and perhaps periprosthetic infection at any site.
Level III, diagnostic study, development of a diagnostic criterion in consecutive patients comparatively to a reference standard.
人工关节周围感染常常带来诊断挑战,因为已发表的诊断标准并不统一。人们已经对预测人工关节感染的新标志物进行了评估。在此,我们评估了关节液中的一种此类标志物——C反应蛋白(CRP)。
我们假设关节内CRP水平在诊断膝关节假体感染方面比血清CRP浓度表现更好。
我们前瞻性纳入了30例患者,其中10例为天然膝关节积液患者,11例为人工膝关节无菌性积液患者,11例为根据2011年肌肉骨骼协会标准定义的人工膝关节感染患者。血清CRP采用比浊法或散射比浊法测定,关节内CRP采用散射比浊法测定。进行了适当的统计学检验以比较三组;P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
人工关节周围感染组的血清和关节内CRP水平比其他两组高5至16倍。尽管ROC曲线下面积无显著差异,但与选定临界值相关的似然比表明关节内CRP具有优势:值>2.78 mg/L提示可能感染(敏感性100%,特异性82%),值>5.37 mg/L提示很可能感染(敏感性90%,特异性91%)。
我们的研究结果表明关节内CRP检测在诊断膝关节假体感染以及可能在诊断任何部位的人工关节周围感染中可能具有作用。
III级,诊断性研究,与参考标准相比在连续患者中制定诊断标准。