Al-Hwiesh Abdulla Khalaf, Abdul-Rahman Ibrahiem Saeed, El-Deen Mohammad Ahmad Nasr, Larbi Emmanuel, Divino-Filho Jose C, Al-Mohanna Fahd Abdul-Aziz, Gupta Krishan L
Department of Internal Medicine, King Fahd University Hospital, University of Dammam, and Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Dammam, Khobar, Saudi Arabia, and Division of Renal Medicine, Clintec, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Perit Dial Int. 2014 Jun;34(4):368-75. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2013.00048. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
In a number of patients, the antidiabetic drug metformin has been associated with lactic acidosis. Despite the fact that diabetes mellitus is the most common cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and that peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an expanding modality of treatment, little is known about optimal treatment strategies in the large group of PD patients with diabetes. In patients with ESRD, the use of metformin has been limited because of the perceived risk of lactic acidosis or severe hypoglycemia. However, metformin use is likely to be beneficial, and PD might itself be a safeguard against the alleged complications.
Our study involved 35 patients with insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes [median age: 54 years; interquartile range (IQR): 47-59 years] on automated PD (APD) therapy. Patients with additional risk factors for lactic acidosis were excluded. Metformin was introduced at a daily dose in the range 0.5 - 1.0 g. All patients were monitored for glycemic control by blood sugar levels and HbA1c. Plasma lactic acid levels were measured weekly for 4 weeks and then monthly to the end of the study. Plasma and effluent metformin and plasma lactate levels were measured simultaneously.
In this cohort, the median duration of diabetes was 18 years (IQR: 14 - 21 years), median time on PD was 31 months (IQR: 27 - 36 months), and median HbA1c was 6.8% (IQR: 5.9% - 6.9%). At metformin introduction and at the end of the study, the median anion gap was 11 mmol/L (IQR: 9 - 16 mmol/L) and 12 mmol/L (IQR: 9 - 16 mmol/L; p > 0.05) respectively, median pH was 7.33 (IQR: 7.32 - 7.36) and 7.34 (IQR: 7.32 - 7.36, p > 0.05) respectively, and mean metformin concentration in plasma and peritoneal fluid was 2.57 ± 1.49 mg/L and 2.83 ± 1.7 mg/L respectively. In the group overall, mean lactate was 1.39 ± 0.61 mmol/L, and hyperlactemia (>2 mmol/L to 5 mmol/L) was found in 4 of 525 plasma samples (0.76%), but the patients presented no symptoms. None of the patients registered a plasma lactate level above 5 mmol/L. We observed no correlation between plasma metformin and plasma lactate (r = 0.27).
Metformin may be used with caution in APD patients with insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes. Although our study demonstrated the feasibility of metformin use in APD, it was not large enough to demonstrate safety; a large-scale study is needed.
在一些患者中,抗糖尿病药物二甲双胍与乳酸性酸中毒有关。尽管糖尿病是终末期肾病(ESRD)最常见的病因,且腹膜透析(PD)是一种不断发展的治疗方式,但对于大量糖尿病PD患者的最佳治疗策略知之甚少。在ESRD患者中,由于存在乳酸性酸中毒或严重低血糖的风险,二甲双胍的使用受到限制。然而,使用二甲双胍可能有益,且PD本身可能是预防所谓并发症的一种保障。
我们的研究纳入了35例接受自动化腹膜透析(APD)治疗的胰岛素依赖型2型糖尿病患者[中位年龄:54岁;四分位间距(IQR):47 - 59岁]。排除有乳酸性酸中毒其他危险因素的患者。以每日0.5 - 1.0 g的剂量引入二甲双胍。通过血糖水平和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)监测所有患者的血糖控制情况。在4周内每周测量血浆乳酸水平,之后每月测量直至研究结束。同时测量血浆和透出液中的二甲双胍以及血浆乳酸水平。
在该队列中,糖尿病的中位病程为18年(IQR:14 - 21年),PD的中位时间为31个月(IQR:27 - 36个月),中位HbA1c为6.8%(IQR:5.9% - 6.9%)。在引入二甲双胍时和研究结束时,中位阴离子间隙分别为11 mmol/L(IQR:9 - 16 mmol/L)和12 mmol/L(IQR:9 - 16 mmol/L;p > 0.05),中位pH分别为7.33(IQR:7.32 - 7.36)和7.34(IQR:7.32 - 7.36,p > 0.05),血浆和腹膜液中二甲双胍的平均浓度分别为2.57 ± 1.49 mg/L和2.83 ± 1.7 mg/L。在整个组中,平均乳酸水平为1.39 ± 0.61 mmol/L,在525份血浆样本中有4份(0.76%)发现高乳酸血症(>2 mmol/L至5 mmol/L),但患者无任何症状。没有患者的血浆乳酸水平高于5 mmol/L。我们观察到血浆二甲双胍与血浆乳酸之间无相关性(r = 0.27)。
对于胰岛素依赖型2型糖尿病的APD患者,可谨慎使用二甲双胍。尽管我们的研究证明了在APD中使用二甲双胍的可行性,但样本量不足以证明其安全性;需要进行大规模研究。