Alvarez Pedro A, Boye Joyce I
Food Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, St-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
Food Agric Immunol. 2014 Jun;25(2):200-208. doi: 10.1080/09540105.2012.762901. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
Recovery of gluten in buckwheat flour was evaluated as part of an effort to produce wheat-contaminated buckwheat flours that could be used as reference materials (RMs) for testing the presence of gluten in buckwheat. RMs of buckwheat containing 0, 20, 100 and 1000 ppm gluten were created and tested by ELISA. The Gluten-Check kit detected gluten accurately at all levels; RIDASCREEN and Biokits tests were accurate at 20 and 100 ppm levels, but at 1000 ppm both suffered from extraction saturation effect; Veratox kit read 60% higher for the 20 ppm RM (i.e., 31.9 ppm), but close to the target at 100 ppm RM; Veratox R5 kit showed low accuracy with around 30% recovery at 20 and 100 ppm and some 60% at 1000 ppm level. Overall, the results showed variations in recovery among different test kits which could have important implications in the accurate detection of gluten in buckwheat.
作为生产可用于检测荞麦中麸质存在的含小麦污染荞麦粉作为参考物质(RM)工作的一部分,对荞麦粉中麸质的回收率进行了评估。制备了含0、20、100和1000 ppm麸质的荞麦参考物质,并通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)进行检测。麸质检测试剂盒在所有水平下都能准确检测到麸质;RIDASCREEN和Biokits检测在20和100 ppm水平下准确,但在1000 ppm时两者都受到提取饱和效应的影响;Veratox试剂盒对20 ppm参考物质的读数高出60%(即31.9 ppm),但在100 ppm参考物质时接近目标值;Veratox R5试剂盒在20和100 ppm时回收率约为30%,在1000 ppm水平时约为60%,准确性较低。总体而言,结果表明不同检测试剂盒之间的回收率存在差异,这可能对准确检测荞麦中的麸质具有重要影响。