Brunetti Luigi, Chen Clement, White Jentora
The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey.
Veterans Affairs Hudson Valley Healthcare System, Castle Point, New York.
Consult Pharm. 2014 Mar;29(3):169-78. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2014.169.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of dabigatran for stroke prevention in the elderly population.
MEDLINE (1948-June 2013), Web of Science (1980-June 2013), and Google Scholar were used to identify relevant literature. Search terms included dabigatran, dabigatran etexilate, geriatric, elderly.
All articles evaluating the use of dabigatran in the elderly were considered for inclusion. Data derived from controlled clinical studies were given priority for inclusion.
Only the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy trial has evaluated dabigatran etexilate for the prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. A post hoc analysis of this study was completed to identify the risks and benefits of therapy in patients 75 years of age and older. Numerous case reports and case series have been published that suggest an increased risk of bleeding in the elderly. Large observational studies, however, have not supported the hypotheses generated by these case reports.
Since the approval of dabigatran etexilate, numerous case reports have suggested the potential dangers of bleeding complications, especially given that there is no known antidote. Observational studies have challenged these case reports and suggest that the increased risk of bleeding is similar or lower compared with warfarin therapy. The increased reporting of bleeding complications may be a result of reporting bias.
Advanced age alone should not exclude the use of dabigatran. Clinicians should base their decision on patient characteristics and careful assessment of risk versus benefit.
评估达比加群在老年人群中预防卒中的安全性和有效性。
使用MEDLINE(1948年 - 2013年6月)、科学引文索引(1980年 - 2013年6月)和谷歌学术搜索来识别相关文献。检索词包括达比加群、达比加群酯、老年医学、老年人。
纳入所有评估达比加群在老年人中使用情况的文章。优先纳入来自对照临床研究的数据。
仅有长期抗凝治疗随机评估试验评估了达比加群酯预防非瓣膜性心房颤动患者卒中的效果。完成了该研究的一项事后分析,以确定75岁及以上患者治疗的风险和益处。已发表了大量病例报告和病例系列,提示老年人出血风险增加。然而,大型观察性研究并未支持这些病例报告所提出的假设。
自达比加群酯获批以来,大量病例报告提示了出血并发症的潜在危险,特别是鉴于尚无已知的解毒剂。观察性研究对这些病例报告提出了质疑,并表明与华法林治疗相比,出血风险增加相似或更低。出血并发症报告增多可能是报告偏倚的结果。
仅高龄本身不应排除使用达比加群。临床医生应根据患者特征以及对风险与获益的仔细评估来做出决策。