Lamont Elizabeth B, Yu Menggang, He Yulei, Saltz Leonard, Muss Hyman, Zaslavsky Alan M
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA.
J Geriatr Oncol. 2014 Jul;5(3):230-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
Medicare claims can be useful in chemotherapy-related comparative effectiveness research (CER) estimating survival, but methods for estimating patients' treatment morbidity are currently lacking. We sought to determine if patients' health care use in the claims is a marker of treatment morbidity.
For 249 elderly Medicare patients with breast or colon cancer who were treated in two adjuvant clinical trials, we merged patients' National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTC AEs) trial data with their contemporaneous Medicare claims. We estimated associations of patients' grade ≥3 CTC AE counts and their use of two types of hospital-based health care in claims (i.e., emergency room (ER) visits and hospitalizations).
ER visits and hospitalizations were significantly positively associated with grade ≥3 CTC AE counts incurred by patients during the study. Eight percent of patients without any grade ≥3 CTC AEs had one or more hospitalizations during the observation period compared to 43% of patients with three or more grade ≥3 CTC AEs (p<0.01). Those who were hospitalized at least once had more than three times the rate of grade ≥3 CTC AEs (IRR 3.70, 95% CI: 2.53-5.40) compared to those who were not. With each hospitalization, the daily incidence rate of any grade ≥3 CTC AE more than doubled (IRR 2.10, 95% CI: 1.54-2.86).
Because hospitalization is strongly associated with clinically significant toxicity it may be a useful outcome for Medicare claim-based CER comparing treatment morbidity for elderly patients receiving different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens.
医疗保险理赔数据在化疗相关的比较疗效研究(CER)中对于估计生存率可能很有用,但目前缺乏估计患者治疗发病率的方法。我们试图确定理赔数据中患者的医疗保健使用情况是否为治疗发病率的一个指标。
对于在两项辅助临床试验中接受治疗的249名患有乳腺癌或结肠癌的老年医疗保险患者,我们将患者的美国国立癌症研究所不良事件通用毒性标准(CTC AE)试验数据与其同期的医疗保险理赔数据进行了合并。我们估计了患者≥3级CTC AE计数与他们在理赔数据中两种基于医院的医疗保健使用情况(即急诊室就诊和住院)之间的关联。
急诊室就诊和住院与患者在研究期间发生的≥3级CTC AE计数显著正相关。在观察期内,没有任何≥3级CTC AE的患者中有8%进行了一次或多次住院治疗,而有三次或更多≥3级CTC AE的患者中这一比例为43%(p<0.01)。与未住院的患者相比,至少住院一次的患者≥3级CTC AE的发生率高出三倍多(风险比3.70,95%置信区间:2.53 - 5.40)。每次住院,任何≥3级CTC AE的每日发病率增加一倍多(风险比2.10,95%置信区间:1.54 - 2.86)。
由于住院与具有临床意义的毒性密切相关,对于基于医疗保险理赔数据的CER来说,在比较接受不同辅助化疗方案的老年患者的治疗发病率时,住院情况可能是一个有用的结果指标。