Breast Imaging Service, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Turin, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Via Genova 3, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Anticancer Res. 2014 Mar;34(3):1219-25.
To define the accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) added to digital mammography (DM) and ultrasound (US) in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
We performed a prospective study of 200 consecutive women with histologically-proven breast cancer using the above imaging techniques. Accuracy measurements were estimated using a lesion-by-lesion analysis for unifocal, multifocal/multicentric, bilateral and all carcinomas. We also calculated sensitivity according to breast density.
DBT had higher sensitivity than DM (90.7% vs. 85.2%). Combined DM and DBT with US yielded a 97.7% sensitivity; despite high sensitivity of MRI (98.8%), the addition of MRI to combined DM with DBT and US did not significantly improve sensitivity. Overall accuracy did not significantly differ between MRI and DM with DBT and US (92.3% vs. 93.7%). Breast density affected sensitivity of DM and DBT (statistically significant difference for DM), not MRI.
There is little gain in sensitivity and no gain in overall accuracy, by performing MRI for patients who have been evaluated with DM with DBT and US.
定义数字乳腺断层合成术(DBT)和磁共振成像(MRI)在数字乳腺摄影(DM)和超声(US)术前评估乳腺癌中的准确性。
我们对 200 例经组织学证实的乳腺癌患者进行了前瞻性研究,使用上述影像学技术。对单发、多灶/多中心、双侧和所有癌进行了病灶对病灶的准确性测量。我们还根据乳腺密度计算了敏感性。
DBT 的敏感性高于 DM(90.7% vs. 85.2%)。DM 和 DBT 联合 US 的敏感性为 97.7%;尽管 MRI 的敏感性很高(98.8%),但将 MRI 加入 DM、DBT 和 US 的联合检查并不能显著提高敏感性。MRI 和 DM 与 DBT 和 US 的总体准确性无显著差异(92.3% vs. 93.7%)。乳腺密度影响 DM 和 DBT 的敏感性(DM 存在统计学差异),但不影响 MRI。
对于已经接受 DM、DBT 和 US 检查的患者,进行 MRI 检查在敏感性和总体准确性方面没有明显获益。