Sharma Vivek Kumar, M Rajajeyakumar, S Velkumary, Subramanian Senthil Kumar, Bhavanani Ananda B, Sahai Ajit, Thangavel Dinesh
Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, JIPMER , Puducherry, India .
Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, Chennai Medical College Hospital & Research Centre , Irungalur, Trichy, Tamilnadu, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Jan;8(1):10-3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7256.3668. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
To compare the cumulative effect of commonly practised slow and fast pranayama on cognitive functions in healthy volunteers.
84 participants who were in self-reported good health, who were in the age group of 18-25 years, who were randomized to fast pranayama, slow pranayama and control group with 28 participants in each group.
Fast pranayama included kapalabhati, bhastrika and kukkuriya. Slow pranayama included nadishodhana, Pranav and Savitri. Respective pranayama training was given for 35 minutes, three times per week, for a duration of 12 weeks under the supervision of a certified yoga trainer. Parameters were recorded before and after 12 weeks of intervention: Perceived stress scale (PSS), BMI, waist to hip ratio and cognitive parameters-letter cancellation test, trail making tests A and B, forward and reverse digit spans and auditory and visual reaction times for red light and green light.
Inter-group comparison was done by one way ANOVA and intra-group comparison was done by paired t-test.
Executive functions, PSS and reaction time improved significantly in both fast and slow pranayama groups, except reverse digit span, which showed an improvement only in fast pranayama group. In addition, percentage reduction in reaction time was significantly more in the fast pranayama group as compared to that in slow pranayama group. Both types of pranayamas are beneficial for cognitive functions, but fast pranayama has additional effects on executive function of manipulation in auditory working memory, central neural processing and sensory-motor performance.
比较常见的快速和慢速呼吸控制法对健康志愿者认知功能的累积影响。
84名自我报告健康状况良好、年龄在18 - 25岁的参与者,随机分为快速呼吸控制法组、慢速呼吸控制法组和对照组,每组28人。
快速呼吸控制法包括圣光调息法、风箱式呼吸法和库克里亚呼吸法。慢速呼吸控制法包括纳地净化法、普拉纳呼吸法和萨维特里呼吸法。在认证瑜伽教练的监督下,分别进行35分钟的相应呼吸控制法训练,每周三次,持续12周。在干预12周前后记录参数:感知压力量表(PSS)、体重指数、腰臀比以及认知参数——字母划消测试、连线测试A和B、顺背和倒背数字广度以及红灯和绿灯的听觉和视觉反应时间。
组间比较采用单因素方差分析,组内比较采用配对t检验。
快速和慢速呼吸控制法组的执行功能、PSS和反应时间均有显著改善,但倒背数字广度仅在快速呼吸控制法组有所改善。此外,快速呼吸控制法组的反应时间减少百分比显著高于慢速呼吸控制法组。两种呼吸控制法对认知功能均有益,但快速呼吸控制法对听觉工作记忆中的操作执行功能、中枢神经处理和感觉运动表现有额外影响。