Program Development Center, Center of Expertise for Chronic Organ Failure (CIRO+), Horn, The Netherlands.
Program Development Center, Center of Expertise for Chronic Organ Failure (CIRO+), Horn, The Netherlands.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Jul;15(7):477-489. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Mar 2.
To systematically review the efficacy of advance care planning (ACP) interventions in different adult patient populations.
Systematic review and meta-analyses.
Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1966 to September 2013), and reference lists.
Randomized controlled trials that describe original data on the efficacy of ACP interventions in adult populations and were written in English.
Fifty-five studies were identified. Study details were recorded using a predefined data abstraction form. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale by 2 independent reviewers. Meta-analytic techniques were conducted using a random effects model. Analyses were stratified for type of intervention: 'advance directives' and 'communication.'
Primary outcome measures were completion of advance directives and occurrence of end-of-life discussions. Secondary outcomes were concordance between preferences for care and delivered care, knowledge of ACP, end-of-life care preferences, quality of communication, satisfaction with healthcare, decisional conflict, use of healthcare services, and symptoms.
Interventions focusing on advance directives as well as interventions that also included communication about end-of-life care increased the completion of advance directives and the occurrence of end-of-life care discussions between patients and healthcare professionals. In addition, interventions that also included communication about ACP, improved concordance between preferences for care and delivered care and may improve other outcomes, such as quality of communication.
ACP interventions increase the completion of advance directives, occurrence of discussions about ACP, concordance between preferences for care and delivered care, and are likely to improve other outcomes for patients and their loved ones in different adult populations. Future studies are necessary to reveal the effective elements of ACP and should focus on the best way to implement structured ACP in standard care.
系统评价不同成年患者人群中预先医疗指示(ACP)干预措施的疗效。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medline/PubMed、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(1966 年至 2013 年 9 月)和参考文献列表。
描述成人人群中 ACP 干预措施疗效的原始数据且为英文书写的随机对照试验。
共确定了 55 项研究。使用预定义的数据提取表记录研究详情。由 2 位独立评审员使用 PEDro 量表评估方法学质量。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。分析按干预类型分层:“预先医疗指示”和“沟通”。
主要结局测量指标为预先医疗指示的完成情况和临终讨论的发生情况。次要结局测量指标为护理偏好与实际护理的一致性、ACP 知识、临终护理偏好、沟通质量、对医疗保健的满意度、决策冲突、医疗保健服务的使用情况和症状。
专注于预先医疗指示的干预措施以及还包括有关临终关怀沟通的干预措施增加了患者与医疗保健专业人员之间预先医疗指示的完成情况和临终关怀讨论的发生。此外,还包括有关 ACP 沟通的干预措施,改善了护理偏好与实际护理的一致性,并可能改善其他结局,如沟通质量。
ACP 干预措施增加了预先医疗指示的完成情况、ACP 讨论的发生、护理偏好与实际护理的一致性,并且可能改善不同成年人群中患者及其家属的其他结局。未来的研究需要揭示 ACP 的有效要素,并应重点研究如何在标准护理中实施结构化 ACP。