New electrocardiographic criteria to differentiate the Type-2 Brugada pattern from electrocardiogram of healthy athletes with r'-wave in leads V1/V2.

AIMS

Diagnosis of Type-2 Brugada pattern remains challenging and it could be confused with other electrocardiogram (ECG) patterns presenting an r'-wave in leads V1-V2 like in healthy athletes. This could impact their ability to perform competitive sports. The aim of the study was to evaluate, as a proof of concept, the new ECG criteria to differentiate the Type-2 Brugada pattern from the ECG pattern of healthy athletes depicting an r'-wave in leads V1-V2.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Surface ECGs from 50 patients with Brugada syndrome and type-2 Brugada pattern and 58 healthy athletes with an r'-wave in leads V1-V2 were analysed. Different criteria based on the characteristics of the triangle formed by the ascendant and descendant arms of the r'-wave in leads V1-V2 were compared. The duration of the base of the triangle at 0.5 mV (5 mm) from high take-off ≥160 ms (4 mm) has a specificity (SP) of 95.6%, sensitivity (SE) 85%, positive predictive value (PPV) 94.4%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 87.9%. The duration of the base of the triangle at the isoelectric line ≥60 ms (1.5 mm) in leads V1-V2 has an SP of 78%, SE 94.8%, PPV 79.3%, and NPV 93.5%. The ratio of the base at isoelectric line/height from the baseline to peak of r'-wave in leads V1-V2 has an SP of 92.1%, SE 82%, PPV 90.1%, and NPV 83.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

The three new ECG criteria were accurate to distinguish the Type-2 Brugada pattern from the ECG pattern with an r'-wave in healthy athletes. The duration of the base of the triangle at 0.5 mV from the high take-off is the easiest to measure and may be used in clinical practice.