Electrical Systems and Optics Research Division, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Mar;135(3):1064-70. doi: 10.1121/1.4864308.
The third-order elastic constants of a material are believed to be sensitive to residual stress, fatigue, and creep damage. The acoustoelastic coefficient is directly related to these third-order elastic constants. Several techniques have been developed to monitor the acoustoelastic coefficient using ultrasound. In this article, two techniques to impose stress on a sample are compared, one using the classical method of applying a static strain using a bending jig and the other applying a dynamic stress due to the presence of an acoustic wave. Results on aluminum samples are compared. Both techniques are found to produce similar values for the acoustoelastic coefficient. The dynamic strain technique however has the advantages that it can be applied to large, real world components, in situ, while ensuring the measurement takes place in the nondestructive, elastic regime.
人们认为材料的三阶弹性常数对残余应力、疲劳和蠕变损伤敏感。声弹性系数与这些三阶弹性常数直接相关。已经开发了几种使用超声波监测声弹性系数的技术。在本文中,比较了两种在样品上施加应力的技术,一种是使用弯曲夹具施加静态应变的经典方法,另一种是由于存在声波而施加动态应力的方法。对铝样品的结果进行了比较。两种技术都发现声弹性系数值相似。然而,动态应变技术具有可以应用于大型、真实世界的组件,原位,同时确保测量在无损、弹性状态下进行的优点。