Hill Garick D, Hehir David A, Bartz Peter J, Rudd Nancy A, Frommelt Michele A, Slicker Julie, Tanem Jena, Frontier Katherine, Xiang Qun, Wang Tao, Tweddell James S, Ghanayem Nancy S
Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.
Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Oct;148(4):1534-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.025. Epub 2014 Feb 8.
Achieving adequate growth after stage 1 palliation for children with single-ventricle heart defects often requires supplemental nutrition through enteral tubes. Significant practice variability exists between centers in the choice of feeding tube. The impact of feeding modality on the growth of patients with a single ventricle after stage 1 palliation was examined using the multiinstitutional National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative data registry.
Characteristics of patients were compared by feeding modality, defined as oral only, nasogastric tube only, oral and nasogastric tube, gastrostomy tube only, and oral and gastrostomy tube. The impact of feeding modality on change in weight for age z-score during the interstage period, from stage 1 palliation discharge to stage 2 palliation, was evaluated by multivariable linear regression, adjusting for important patient characteristics and postoperative morbidities.
In this cohort of 465 patients, all groups demonstrated improved weight for age z-score during the interstage period with a mean increase of 0.3±0.8. In multivariable analysis, feeding modality was not associated with differences in the change in weight for age z-score during the interstage period (P=.72). Risk factors for poor growth were a diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome (P=.003), vocal cord injury (P=.007), and lower target caloric goal at discharge (P=.001).
In this large multicenter cohort, interstage growth improved for all groups and did not differ by feeding modality. With appropriate caloric goals and interstage monitoring, adequate growth may be achieved regardless of feeding modality and therefore local comfort and complication risk should dictate feeding modality.
对于单心室心脏缺陷患儿,在一期姑息治疗后实现充足的生长通常需要通过肠内管补充营养。各中心在喂养管的选择上存在显著的实践差异。利用多机构国家儿科心脏病学质量改进协作数据登记处的数据,研究了喂养方式对一期姑息治疗后单心室患者生长的影响。
根据喂养方式对患者特征进行比较,喂养方式定义为仅口服、仅鼻胃管、口服和鼻胃管、仅胃造口管以及口服和胃造口管。通过多变量线性回归评估喂养方式对从一期姑息治疗出院到二期姑息治疗的过渡期内年龄别体重Z评分变化的影响,并对重要的患者特征和术后并发症进行调整。
在这一包含465例患者的队列中,所有组在过渡期内年龄别体重Z评分均有所改善,平均增加0.3±0.8。在多变量分析中,喂养方式与过渡期内年龄别体重Z评分变化的差异无关(P = 0.72)。生长不良的危险因素包括诊断为左心发育不全综合征(P = 0.003)、声带损伤(P = 0.007)以及出院时较低的目标热量摄入(P = 0.001)。
在这个大型多中心队列中,所有组的过渡期生长情况均有所改善,且不因喂养方式而异。通过适当的热量目标和过渡期监测,无论采用何种喂养方式都可能实现充足的生长,因此局部舒适度和并发症风险应决定喂养方式。