Elnaggar Sameh Y, Tervo Richard, Mattar Saba M
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 6E2, Canada.
Department of Chemistry and Centre for Laser, Atomic and Molecular Sciences, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 6E2, Canada.
J Magn Reson. 2014 May;242:57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2014.01.018. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
A cavity (CV) with a dielectric resonator (DR) insert forms an excellent probe for the use in electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectrometers. The probe's coupling coefficient, κ, the quality factor, Q, and the filling factor, η are vital in assessing the EPR spectrometer's performance. Coupled mode theory (CMT) is used to derive general expressions for these parameters. For large permittivity the dominating factor in κ is the ratio of the DR and CV cross sectional areas rather than the dielectric constant. Thus in some cases, resonators with low dielectric constant can couple much stronger with the cavity than do resonators with a high dielectric constant. When the DR and CV frequencies are degenerate, the coupled η is the average of the two uncoupled ones. In practical EPR probes the coupled η is approximately half of that of the DR. The Q of the coupled system generally depends on the eigenvectors, uncoupled frequencies (ω1,ω2) and the individual quality factors (Q1,Q2). It is calculated for different probe configurations and found to agree with the corresponding HFSS® simulations. Provided there is a large difference between the Q1, Q2 pair and the frequencies of DR and CV are degenerate, Q is approximately equal to double the minimum of Q1 and Q2. In general, the signal enhancement ratio, Iwithinsert/Iempty, is obtained from Q and η. For low loss DRs it only depends on η1/η2. However, when the DR has a low Q, the uncoupled Qs are also needed. In EPR spectroscopy it is desirable to excite only a single mode. The separation between the modes, Φ, is calculated as a function of κ and Q. It is found to be significantly greater than five times the average bandwidth. Thus for practical probes, it is possible to excite one of the coupled modes without exciting the other. The CMT expressions derived in this article are quite general and are in excellent agreement with the lumped circuit approach and finite numerical simulations. Hence they can also be applied to a loop-gap resonator in a cavity. For the design effective EPR probes, one needs to consider the κ, Q and η parameters.
带有介电谐振器(DR)插入件的腔体(CV)构成了用于电子顺磁共振(EPR)光谱仪的出色探头。探头的耦合系数κ、品质因数Q和填充因数η对于评估EPR光谱仪的性能至关重要。耦合模理论(CMT)用于推导这些参数的通用表达式。对于大介电常数,κ中的主导因素是DR和CV的横截面积之比,而非介电常数。因此在某些情况下,低介电常数的谐振器与腔体的耦合可能比高介电常数的谐振器更强。当DR和CV频率简并时,耦合的η是两个未耦合的η的平均值。在实际的EPR探头中,耦合的η约为DR的η的一半。耦合系统的Q通常取决于本征向量、未耦合频率(ω1,ω2)和各个品质因数(Q1,Q2)。针对不同的探头配置进行了计算,发现与相应的HFSS®模拟结果相符。如果Q1、Q2这一对数值之间存在很大差异且DR和CV的频率简并,则Q大约等于Q1和Q2中的最小值的两倍。一般而言,信号增强比Iwithinsert/Iempty由Q和η得出。对于低损耗的DR,它仅取决于η1/η2。然而,当DR的Q较低时,还需要未耦合的Qs。在EPR光谱学中,希望仅激发单一模式。计算了模式之间的间隔Φ作为κ和Q的函数。发现它明显大于平均带宽的五倍。因此对于实际探头,可以激发其中一个耦合模式而不激发另一个。本文推导的CMT表达式非常通用,与集总电路方法和有限数值模拟结果高度一致。因此它们也可应用于腔体中的环形缝隙谐振器。为了设计有效的EPR探头,需要考虑κ、Q和η参数。