Runte-Geidel A, Girela E, López A, Ruiz F, Torres-González F
Rev Esp Sanid Penit. 2014;16(1):3-10. doi: 10.4321/S1575-06202014000100002.
The aim of the study was to ascertain the opinions of both inmates and staff of prison establishments about the use of coercive measures justified for clinical reasons for people with mental health problems and about the need to create protocols to regulate the application of these measures.
These opinions were gathered in a Qualitative Study with Focus Groups (prison inmates and prison staff) from the Granada Penitentiary Centre and the Alicante Penitentiary Psychiatric Hospital, both in Spain.
The results showed that forced medication is the most commonly used coercive measure in these institutions. The inmates did not understand and rejected the use of this measure, above all because they were poorly informed about their illness and the medication required to treat it. The staff however defended the benefits of psychiatric medicine, even when administered without the patient's consent.
Both inmates and staff agreed that it would be useful to have a protocol regulating the use of coercive measures. The study has also identified a number of important factors that could help to reduce the need for coercive measures or make their use unnecessary.
本研究旨在确定监狱机构的囚犯和工作人员对于出于临床原因对有心理健康问题的人使用强制手段的看法,以及对于制定规范这些措施应用的协议的必要性的看法。
通过定性研究中的焦点小组(监狱囚犯和监狱工作人员)收集了来自西班牙格拉纳达监狱中心和阿利坎特监狱精神病医院的这些看法。
结果表明,强制用药是这些机构中最常用的强制手段。囚犯不理解并拒绝使用这种手段,主要是因为他们对自己的疾病以及治疗所需药物了解甚少。然而,工作人员为精神药物的益处进行了辩护,即使是在未经患者同意的情况下给药。
囚犯和工作人员都认为制定一项规范强制手段使用的协议会很有用。该研究还确定了一些重要因素,这些因素有助于减少对强制手段的需求或使其不再必要。