Thompson Helen M, Levine Steven L, Doering Janine, Norman Steve, Manson Philip, Sutton Peter, von Mérey Georg
FERA, Sand Hutton, York, United Kingdom.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2014 Jul;10(3):463-70. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1529. Epub 2014 May 19.
This study aimed to develop an approach to evaluate potential effects of plant protection products on honeybee brood with colonies at realistic worst-case exposure rates. The approach comprised 2 stages. In the first stage, honeybee colonies were exposed to a commercial formulation of glyphosate applied to flowering Phacelia tanacetifolia with glyphosate residues quantified in relevant matrices (pollen and nectar) collected by foraging bees on days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7 postapplication and glyphosate levels in larvae were measured on days 4 and 7. Glyphosate levels in pollen were approximately 10 times higher than in nectar and glyphosate demonstrated rapid decline in both matrices. Residue data along with foraging rates and food requirements of the colony were then used to set dose rates in the effects study. In the second stage, the toxicity of technical glyphosate to developing honeybee larvae and pupae, and residues in larvae, were then determined by feeding treated sucrose directly to honeybee colonies at dose rates that reflect worst-case exposure scenarios. There were no significant effects from glyphosate observed in brood survival, development, and mean pupal weight. Additionally, there were no biologically significant levels of adult mortality observed in any glyphosate treatment group. Significant effects were observed only in the fenoxycarb toxic reference group and included increased brood mortality and a decline in the numbers of bees and brood. Mean glyphosate residues in larvae were comparable at 4 days after spray application in the exposure study and also following dosing at a level calculated from the mean measured levels in pollen and nectar, showing the applicability and robustness of the approach for dose setting with honeybee brood studies. This study has developed a versatile and predictive approach for use in higher tier honeybee toxicity studies. It can be used to realistically quantify exposure of colonies to pesticides to allow the appropriate dose rates to be determined, based on realistic worst-case residues in pollen and nectar and estimated intake by the colony, as shown by the residue analysis. Previous studies have used the standard methodology developed primarily to identify pesticides with insect-growth disrupting properties of pesticide formulations, which are less reliant on identifying realistic exposure scenarios. However, this adaptation of the method can be used to determine dose-response effects of colony level exposure to pesticides with a wide range of properties. This approach would limit the number of replicated tunnel or field-scale studies that need to be undertaken to assess effects on honeybee brood and may be of particular benefit where residues in pollen and nectar are crop- and/or formulation-specific, such as systemic seed treatments and granular applications.
本研究旨在开发一种方法,以实际最坏情况暴露率下的蜂群来评估植物保护产品对蜜蜂幼虫的潜在影响。该方法包括两个阶段。在第一阶段,将蜜蜂蜂群暴露于草甘膦商业制剂中,该制剂施用于开花的天蓝苜蓿上,在施药后第1、2、3、4和7天,对觅食蜜蜂采集的相关基质(花粉和花蜜)中的草甘膦残留量进行定量,并在第4天和第7天测量幼虫中的草甘膦水平。花粉中的草甘膦水平比花蜜中的高约10倍,并且草甘膦在两种基质中均迅速下降。然后,将残留数据与蜂群的觅食率和食物需求一起用于设定效应研究中的剂量率。在第二阶段,通过以反映最坏情况暴露场景的剂量率将经处理的蔗糖直接喂给蜜蜂蜂群,来确定草甘膦原药对发育中的蜜蜂幼虫和蛹的毒性以及幼虫中的残留量。在幼虫存活、发育和平均蛹重方面,未观察到草甘膦有显著影响。此外,在任何草甘膦处理组中均未观察到具有生物学意义的成年蜜蜂死亡率。仅在苯氧威毒性参照组中观察到显著影响,包括幼虫死亡率增加以及蜜蜂和幼虫数量减少。在暴露研究中施药后4天,以及按照从花粉和花蜜中测得的平均水平计算得出的水平给药后,幼虫中的草甘膦平均残留量相当,这表明该方法在蜜蜂幼虫研究剂量设定方面的适用性和稳健性。本研究开发了一种通用且具有预测性的方法,用于更高层级的蜜蜂毒性研究。它可用于实际量化蜂群对农药的暴露,以便根据花粉和花蜜中实际最坏情况的残留量以及蜂群的估计摄入量来确定合适的剂量率,如残留分析所示。以往的研究主要使用已开发的标准方法来识别具有昆虫生长干扰特性的农药制剂,这些方法不太依赖于确定实际的暴露场景。然而,这种方法的改进可用于确定蜂群水平暴露于具有广泛特性的农药的剂量 - 反应效应。这种方法将限制为评估对蜜蜂幼虫的影响而需要进行的重复隧道或田间规模研究的数量,并且在花粉和花蜜中的残留量因作物和/或制剂而异(如内吸性种子处理和颗粒剂施用)的情况下可能特别有用。