James Kirstyn, Dolan Eamon, O'Brien Eoin
aDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons, Connolly Memorial Hospital, Blanchardstown bConway Institute of Biomolecular Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Blood Press Monit. 2014 Jun;19(3):134-9. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000034.
Ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM), although recommended for the diagnosis and management of hypertension, has limited availability. The objective of this study was to show that if the characteristics of patients attending pharmacies for ABPM are similar to those attending primary care, the technique can be made more widely available to patients through pharmacies.
A comparative study using a software program that allowed central collection, analysis and comparison of ABPM data from patients attending primary care and pharmacies for assessment of hypertension in Ireland.
ABPM data from 46 978 patients attending primary care were compared with 1698 attending pharmacies between 2007 and 2013. The age, sex and blood pressure characteristics of patients attending primary care and pharmacies were similar. The mean pressures in all categories, except for systolic blood pressure recorded in primary care, were higher in men. The first ABPM measurements recorded in pharmacies were slightly higher than those in primary care (150.8 ± 19.5/88.7 ± 13.7 vs. 149.6 ± 20.7/88.0 ± 14.4 mmHg). More patients attending primary care were normotensive than those attending pharmacies (19.5 vs. 16.4%), whereas more patients attending pharmacies were hypertensive than those attending primary care (62.8 vs. 60.7%), particularly female patients (61.0 vs. 56.4%). White-coat hypertension was similar in patients attending primary care and pharmacies (19.8 vs. 20.8%), but it was more prevalent in men attending pharmacies (22.0 vs. 17.4%) and in women attending primary care (21.9 vs. 19.7%). There were more dippers in pharmacy then primary care ABPMs (84.7 vs. 79.4%). A preference for having ABPM on Fridays and Saturdays was evident in patients attending pharmacies (19.6 vs. 6.6%), whereas there was a preference for early morning recording in primary care (4.1 vs. 1.1%).
This study, which is the first to report on ABPM data from the pharmacy setting, shows that the blood pressure characteristics of patients with ABPMs recorded in pharmacies are similar to those recorded in primary care practices. It is feasible, therefore, to perform ABPM in pharmacies, which can be utilized to make ABPM more accessible to the large number of patients in the population with hypertension.
动态血压监测(ABPM)虽被推荐用于高血压的诊断和管理,但其可及性有限。本研究的目的是表明,如果到药房进行ABPM监测的患者特征与到初级保健机构就诊的患者相似,那么通过药房可为患者更广泛地提供这项技术。
一项对比研究,使用一个软件程序,该程序允许集中收集、分析和比较来自爱尔兰初级保健机构和药房的患者的ABPM数据,以评估高血压。
将2007年至2013年间46978名到初级保健机构就诊患者的ABPM数据与1698名到药房就诊患者的ABPM数据进行了比较。到初级保健机构和药房就诊患者的年龄、性别和血压特征相似。除初级保健机构记录的收缩压外,所有类别中男性的平均血压更高。在药房记录的首次ABPM测量值略高于初级保健机构的测量值(150.8±19.5/88.7±13.7 vs. 149.6±20.7/88.0±14.4 mmHg)。到初级保健机构就诊的血压正常患者比到药房就诊的更多(19.5%对16.4%),而到药房就诊的高血压患者比到初级保健机构就诊的更多(62.8%对60.7%),尤其是女性患者(61.0%对56.4%)。初级保健机构和药房就诊患者的白大衣高血压情况相似(19.8%对20.8%),但在到药房就诊的男性中更普遍(22.0%对17.4%),在到初级保健机构就诊的女性中也更普遍(21.9%对19.7%)。药房ABPM监测中勺型血压者比初级保健机构的更多(84.7%对79.4%)。到药房就诊的患者明显更倾向于在周五和周六进行ABPM监测(19.6%对6.6%),而到初级保健机构就诊的患者更倾向于在清晨记录(4.1%对1.1%)。
本研究是首个报告药房环境下ABPM数据的研究,表明在药房记录ABPM的患者的血压特征与在初级保健机构记录的相似。因此,在药房进行ABPM是可行的,可利用这一点让大量高血压患者更易获得ABPM监测。