GL PharmTech Corp., Seongnam, Gyeonggi, 462-807, Republic of Korea.
Arch Pharm Res. 2015 Jan;38(1):73-80. doi: 10.1007/s12272-014-0343-3. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
This study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of two tacrolimus formulations which had different in vitro drug release profiles. Dynamic solubility, in vitro dissolution profiles of the two formulations, and their influence on pharmacokinetics were examined. The male volunteers were randomly assigned to receive a single 1-mg capsule of the test or reference formulation and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using a noncompartmental method. The two formulations released >85 % of tacrolimus in water within 30 min, which passed the criterion of evaluating the test formulation. However, the test formulation produced a faster initial release rate and plateaued in about 15 min, while the reference showed almost zero order initial release profiles. The AUC0-∞ values were 145.92 (reference) and 140.49 ng h/mL (test). The mean Cmax was 15.70 (reference) and 16.08 ng/mL (test) with Tmax values of 1.63 and 1.60 h, respectively. The t1/2 for the reference and test formulations was 29.12 and 27.85 h, respectively. Relative bioavailability was calculated to be 96.28 %. The point estimates for the mean ratio of the test to reference for the AUC0-t and Cmax were 0.969 and 1.026, respectively, satisfying the criterion for bioequivalence. The results suggest that the test formulation is pharmacokinetically equivalent to the reference in terms of both rate and extent of absorption. Even though the in vitro dissolution profiles of the formulations might not be equivalent, the pharmacokinetics indicated bioequivalence. Therefore, when developing poorly soluble drugs, it might be beneficial to pay attention to the dynamic solubility as well as dissolution profiles.
本研究旨在评估两种体外药物释放特征不同的他克莫司制剂的药代动力学和生物等效性。考察了两种制剂的动态溶解度、体外溶出度及其对药代动力学的影响。将男性志愿者随机分为单次服用受试或参比制剂 1 毫克胶囊,并采用非房室模型法测定药代动力学参数。两种制剂在 30 分钟内水相中释放超过 85%的他克莫司,符合评价受试制剂的标准。然而,受试制剂的初始释放速度更快,约 15 分钟达到平台期,而参比制剂的初始释放几乎呈零级。AUC0-∞值分别为 145.92(参比)和 140.49ng·h/mL(受试)。Cmax 的平均值分别为 15.70(参比)和 16.08ng/mL(受试),Tmax 值分别为 1.63 和 1.60h。参比和受试制剂的 t1/2 分别为 29.12 和 27.85h。相对生物利用度计算为 96.28%。AUC0-t 和 Cmax 的受试与参比比值的点估计分别为 0.969 和 1.026,均符合生物等效性标准。结果表明,受试制剂在吸收速度和程度方面与参比制剂具有生物等效性。尽管两种制剂的体外溶出度可能不相等,但药代动力学表明生物等效。因此,在开发难溶性药物时,关注动态溶解度和溶出度可能会有所裨益。