Hokkanen Ann-Helena, Raekallio Marja R, Salla Kati, Hänninen Laura, Viitasaari Elina, Norring Marianna, Raussi Satu, Rinne Valtteri M, Scheinin Mika, Vainio Outi M
Department of Production Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2014 Jul;41(4):372-7. doi: 10.1111/vaa.12150. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
To study the effects of oromucosal detomidine gel administered sublingually to calves prior to disbudding, and to compare its efficacy with intravenously (IV) administered detomidine.
Randomised, prospective clinical study.
Twenty dairy calves aged 12.4 ± 4.4days (mean ± SD), weight 50.5 ± 9.0 kg.
Detomidine at 80 μg kg(-1) was administered to ten calves sublingually (GEL) and at 30 μg kg(-1) to ten control calves IV (V. jugularis). Meloxicam (0.5 mg kg(-1) ) and local anaesthetic (lidocaine 3 mg kg(-1) ) were administered before heat cauterization of horn buds. Heart rate (HR), body temperature and clinical sedation were monitored over 240 minutes. Blood was collected from the V. cephalica during the same period for drug concentration analysis. Pharmacokinetic variables were calculated from the plasma detomidine concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods. Statistical analyses compared routes of administration by Student's t-test and linear mixed models as relevant.
The maximum plasma detomidine concentration after GEL was 2.1 ± 1.2 ng mL(-1) (mean ±SD) and the time of maximum concentration was 66.0 ± 36.9 minutes. The bioavailability of detomidine was approximately 34% with GEL. Similar sedation scores were reached in both groups after administration of detomidine, but maximal sedation was reached earlier in the IV group (10 minutes) than in the GEL group (40 minutes). HR was lower after IV than GEL from 5 to 10 minutes after administration. All animals were adequately sedated, and we were able to administer local anaesthetic without resistance to all of the calves before disbudding.
Oromucosally administered detomidine is an effective sedative agent for calves prior to disbudding.
研究在犊牛去角前舌下给予口腔黏膜用右美托咪定凝胶的效果,并将其疗效与静脉注射(IV)右美托咪定进行比较。
随机、前瞻性临床研究。
20头12.4±4.4日龄(均值±标准差)、体重50.5±9.0千克的奶牛犊牛。
10头犊牛舌下给予80μg/kg的右美托咪定(凝胶组),10头对照犊牛静脉注射(颈静脉)30μg/kg的右美托咪定。在对角芽进行热烧灼前给予美洛昔康(0.5mg/kg)和局部麻醉剂(利多卡因3mg/kg)。在240分钟内监测心率(HR)、体温和临床镇静情况。在此期间从头部静脉采血进行药物浓度分析。使用非房室方法根据血浆右美托咪定浓度-时间数据计算药代动力学变量。相关统计分析采用Student t检验和线性混合模型比较给药途径。
凝胶组右美托咪定的最大血浆浓度为2.1±1.2ng/mL(均值±标准差),达峰时间为66.0±36.9分钟。右美托咪定经凝胶给药的生物利用度约为34%。给予右美托咪定后两组达到相似的镇静评分,但静脉注射组达到最大镇静的时间(10分钟)早于凝胶组(40分钟)。给药后5至10分钟,静脉注射组的HR低于凝胶组。所有动物均得到充分镇静,并且在去角前我们能够毫无阻力地对所有犊牛给予局部麻醉剂。
口腔黏膜给予右美托咪定是犊牛去角前一种有效的镇静剂。