Mitchell Helen, Noble Simon, Finlay Ilora, Nelson Annmarie
Department of Palliative Medicine, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Caernarfan, UK.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2013 Mar;3(1):46-52. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000220. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
Within the UK, general practitioners (GPs) are required to maintain a register of palliative patients under their care. The term 'palliative' when applied to patients encompasses a highly heterogeneous population with varying meanings amongst health professionals. We explored GPs views of what defines a palliative care patient in the context of identifying clinical service needs.
Audiotaped semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs to explore how they identify patients requiring inclusion on a palliative care register. Thematic analysis was undertaken and emerging themes identified.
Major themes suggested GPs found it difficult to define the palliative care patient. The decision to include a patient on the palliative care register was made as a multidisciplinary team. Patients not identified as 'palliative' were often discussed unofficially if care requirements were significant or prognosis uncertain. The needs of patients with non-malignant disease were considered equal to those with cancer but the challenges of identifying such patients greater. More emphasis was placed on intensity of care required than prognosis. Inclusion on a register triggered greater professional input and was considered beneficial to patient care.
No definition of the palliative care patient exists in working practice and without one there is a risk that some patients with palliative needs will not receive the necessary support, while others may access valuable resources before time. Achieving health policy targets which require identification of palliative patients will continue to be a challenge until a workable and reliable definition of the term 'palliative' is agreed upon.
在英国,全科医生(GPs)需要对其照料的姑息治疗患者进行登记。当“姑息治疗”一词应用于患者时,涵盖了一个高度异质的群体,在卫生专业人员中具有不同的含义。我们在确定临床服务需求的背景下,探讨了全科医生对姑息治疗患者定义的看法。
对全科医生进行了录音半结构化访谈,以探讨他们如何识别需要纳入姑息治疗登记册的患者。进行了主题分析并确定了新出现的主题。
主要主题表明,全科医生发现很难定义姑息治疗患者。将患者纳入姑息治疗登记册的决定是由多学科团队做出的。如果护理需求重大或预后不确定,未被认定为“姑息治疗”的患者经常会在非正式场合被讨论。非恶性疾病患者的需求被认为与癌症患者的需求相同,但识别此类患者的挑战更大。更多地强调了所需护理的强度而非预后。纳入登记册引发了更多的专业投入,并被认为对患者护理有益。
在实际工作中不存在姑息治疗患者的定义,没有定义就有可能出现一些有姑息治疗需求的患者得不到必要支持,而另一些患者可能过早获得宝贵资源的情况。在就“姑息治疗”一词达成可行且可靠的定义之前,实现需要识别姑息治疗患者的卫生政策目标仍将是一项挑战。