Hefner Joseph T, Ousley Stephen D
Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command, Central Identification Laboratory, 310 Worchester Ave. BLDG 45, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, HI 96853-5530.
J Forensic Sci. 2014 Jul;59(4):883-90. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12421. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
Ancestry assessments using cranial morphoscopic traits currently rely on subjective trait lists and observer experience rather than empirical support. The trait list approach, which is untested, unverified, and in many respects unrefined, is relied upon because of tradition and subjective experience. Our objective was to examine the utility of frequently cited morphoscopic traits and to explore eleven appropriate and novel methods for classifying an unknown cranium into one of several reference groups. Based on these results, artificial neural networks (aNNs), OSSA, support vector machines, and random forest models showed mean classification accuracies of at least 85%. The aNNs had the highest overall classification rate (87.8%), and random forests show the smallest difference between the highest (90.4%) and lowest (76.5%) classification accuracies. The results of this research demonstrate that morphoscopic traits can be successfully used to assess ancestry without relying only on the experience of the observer.
目前,利用颅骨形态特征进行祖先评估依赖于主观的特征列表和观察者的经验,而非实证支持。由于传统和主观经验,未经测试、未经验证且在许多方面未完善的特征列表方法仍被采用。我们的目标是检验经常被引用的形态特征的效用,并探索十一种将未知颅骨分类到几个参考组之一的合适且新颖的方法。基于这些结果,人工神经网络(ANNs)、OSSA、支持向量机和随机森林模型的平均分类准确率至少为85%。人工神经网络的总体分类率最高(87.8%),随机森林在最高(90.4%)和最低(76.5%)分类准确率之间的差异最小。本研究结果表明,形态特征可成功用于评估祖先,而不必仅依赖观察者的经验。