Olino Thomas M, Dougherty Lea R, Bufferd Sara J, Carlson Gabrielle A, Klein Daniel N
Department of Psychology, Temple University, 1701 N. 13th St, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA,
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2014 Oct;42(7):1201-11. doi: 10.1007/s10802-014-9865-x.
A number of studies have found that broadband internalizing and externalizing factors provide a parsimonious framework for understanding the structure of psychopathology across childhood, adolescence, and adulthood. However, few of these studies have examined psychopathology in young children, and several recent studies have found support for alternative models, including a bi-factor model with common and specific factors. The present study used parents' (typically mothers') reports on a diagnostic interview in a community sample of 3-year old children (n = 541; 53.9 % male) to compare the internalizing-externalizing latent factor model with a bi-factor model. The bi-factor model provided a better fit to the data. To test the concurrent validity of this solution, we examined associations between this model and paternal reports and laboratory observations of child temperament. The internalizing factor was associated with low levels of surgency and high levels of fear; the externalizing factor was associated with high levels of surgency and disinhibition and low levels of effortful control; and the common factor was associated with high levels of surgency and negative affect and low levels of effortful control. These results suggest that psychopathology in preschool-aged children may be explained by a single, common factor influencing nearly all disorders and unique internalizing and externalizing factors. These findings indicate that shared variance across internalizing and externalizing domains is substantial and are consistent with recent suggestions that emotion regulation difficulties may be a common vulnerability for a wide array of psychopathology.
多项研究发现,宽泛的内化和外化因素为理解儿童期、青少年期及成年期精神病理学的结构提供了一个简洁的框架。然而,这些研究中很少有对幼儿精神病理学进行考察的,并且最近的几项研究为包括具有共同因素和特定因素的双因素模型在内的替代模型提供了支持。本研究采用父母(通常是母亲)对一个3岁儿童社区样本(n = 541;53.9%为男性)进行诊断访谈的报告,将内化-外化潜在因素模型与双因素模型进行比较。双因素模型对数据的拟合度更好。为了检验该解决方案的同时效度,我们考察了该模型与父亲报告以及儿童气质的实验室观察结果之间的关联。内化因素与低水平的外向性和高水平的恐惧相关;外化因素与高水平的外向性和抑制缺乏以及低水平的努力控制相关;共同因素与高水平的外向性和消极情绪以及低水平的努力控制相关。这些结果表明,学龄前儿童的精神病理学可能由一个影响几乎所有障碍的单一共同因素以及独特的内化和外化因素来解释。这些发现表明,内化和外化领域之间的共同方差很大,并且与最近的观点一致,即情绪调节困难可能是多种精神病理学的一个共同易感性因素。