Kusano Toru, Etoh Tsuyoshi, Akagi Tomonori, Ueda Yoshitake, Shiroshita Hidefumi, Yasuda Kazuhiro, Satoh Masahiro, Inomata Masafumi, Shiraishi Norio, Kitano Seigo
Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Oita, Japan.
Dig Endosc. 2014 Sep;26(5):638-45. doi: 10.1111/den.12268. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
We have focused on sodium alginate (SA) solution as a potential submucosal injection material for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). A previous SA solution had high viscosity and problems such as difficult handling. After its properties were adjusted, SA solution was examined in vitro and its clinical safety was evaluated.
With 0.4% sodium hyaluronate (SH) solution as a control, catheter injectability and mucosa-elevating capacity of 0.3-0.8% SA solutions were evaluated. Next, 0.6% SA solution was used for ESD in 10 patients with early gastric cancer in a prospective clinical study.
Compared with 0.4% SH solution, 0.6% SA solution exhibited no significant difference in catheter injectability but significant superiority in mucosa-elevating capacity. In the clinical study, no adverse events were observed in any patient.
The safety of 0.6% SA solution as a submucosal injection material was confirmed and it is suggested that its efficacy should be investigated in a larger number of cases.
我们将海藻酸钠(SA)溶液作为内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)潜在的黏膜下注射材料进行了研究。之前的SA溶液具有高粘度以及操作困难等问题。在对其性质进行调整后,对SA溶液进行了体外研究并评估了其临床安全性。
以0.4%透明质酸钠(SH)溶液作为对照,评估了0.3 - 0.8% SA溶液的导管注射性和黏膜提升能力。接下来,在一项前瞻性临床研究中,将0.6% SA溶液用于10例早期胃癌患者的ESD。
与0.4% SH溶液相比,0.6% SA溶液在导管注射性方面无显著差异,但在黏膜提升能力方面具有显著优势。在临床研究中,未观察到任何患者出现不良事件。
证实了0.6% SA溶液作为黏膜下注射材料的安全性,并建议在更多病例中研究其疗效。