Strachan Ryan T, Sun Jin-peng, Rominger David H, Violin Jonathan D, Ahn Seungkirl, Rojas Bie Thomsen Alex, Zhu Xiao, Kleist Andrew, Costa Tommaso, Lefkowitz Robert J
From the Department of Medicine, Duke University, Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Key Laboratory of Experimental Teratology of the Ministry of Education, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University, School of Medicine, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China.
J Biol Chem. 2014 May 16;289(20):14211-24. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.548131. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
The concept of "biased agonism" arises from the recognition that the ability of an agonist to induce a receptor-mediated response (i.e. "efficacy") can differ across the multiple signal transduction pathways (e.g. G protein and β-arrestin (βarr)) emanating from a single GPCR. Despite the therapeutic promise of biased agonism, the molecular mechanism(s) whereby biased agonists selectively engage signaling pathways remain elusive. This is due in large part to the challenges associated with quantifying ligand efficacy in cells. To address this, we developed a cell-free approach to directly quantify the transducer-specific molecular efficacies of balanced and biased ligands for the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R), a prototypic GPCR. Specifically, we defined efficacy in allosteric terms, equating shifts in ligand affinity (i.e. KLo/KHi) at AT1R-Gq and AT1R-βarr2 fusion proteins with their respective molecular efficacies for activating Gq and βarr2. Consistent with ternary complex model predictions, transducer-specific molecular efficacies were strongly correlated with cellular efficacies for activating Gq and βarr2. Subsequent comparisons across transducers revealed that biased AT1R agonists possess biased molecular efficacies that were in strong agreement with the signaling bias observed in cellular assays. These findings not only represent the first measurements of the thermodynamic driving forces underlying differences in ligand efficacy between transducers but also support a molecular mechanism whereby divergent transducer-specific molecular efficacies generate biased agonism at a GPCR.
“偏向性激动作用”这一概念源于人们认识到,激动剂诱导受体介导反应(即“效能”)的能力在源自单个G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)的多个信号转导途径(如G蛋白和β-抑制蛋白(βarr))中可能存在差异。尽管偏向性激动作用具有治疗前景,但偏向性激动剂选择性激活信号通路的分子机制仍不清楚。这在很大程度上是由于在细胞中量化配体效能存在挑战。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一种无细胞方法,直接量化平衡型和偏向性配体对血管紧张素II 1型受体(AT1R,一种典型的GPCR)的传感器特异性分子效能。具体而言,我们从变构角度定义效能,将AT1R-Gq和AT1R-βarr2融合蛋白上配体亲和力的变化(即KLo/KHi)与其激活Gq和βarr2的各自分子效能等同起来。与三元复合物模型预测一致,传感器特异性分子效能与激活Gq和βarr2的细胞效能密切相关。随后对不同传感器的比较表明,偏向性AT1R激动剂具有偏向性分子效能,这与细胞实验中观察到的信号偏向性高度一致。这些发现不仅首次测量了传感器之间配体效能差异背后的热力学驱动力,还支持了一种分子机制,即不同的传感器特异性分子效能在GPCR上产生偏向性激动作用。