Chien Kuo-Liong, Chao Chia-Lun, Su Ta-Cheng
Institute of Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National TaiwanUniversity, Taipei, Taiwan ; Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2005 Mar;66(2):69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2005.04.005.
In the treatment of hypertension, combination therapy is important10 because antihypertensive monotherapy is effective in only 40% of patients worldwide. Amlodipine is a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker with a slow onset and long duration of action. Benazepril hydrochloride is a prodrug hydrolyzed by esterase to the active metabolite benazeprilat, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. In 1995, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the use of a capsule formulation of combination amlodipine-benazepril for hypertension.
The aim of this study was to compare the bioavailability and tolerability10 of the capsule formulation with those of a tablet formulation of combination amlodipine-benazepril in healthy volunteers.
This single-dose, 2-sequence, 2-period, open-label, crossover10 study recruited healthy, adult, male volunteers with normotension. Subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment sequences: a single-dose tablet containing amlodipine 5 mg plus benazepril 10 mg, followed by a single-dose capsule containing the same dose of each drug (AB), or vice versa (BA). The treatment period for each drug consisted of dosing and pharmacokinetic analysis on day 1, followed by pharmacokinetic analysis on days 2 to 7. Treatment periods were separated by a 4-week washout period. For pharmacokinetic analysis, serial blood samples were obtained before dosing and at 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 minutes and 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 60, 84, 108, 132, and 156 hours after dosing. Tolerability was assessed using subject interview and spontaneous reporting.
Twelve healthy, male, Taiwanese subjects (mean [SD] age, 23.510 [1.7] years) participated in the study. No statistically significant differences inbioavailability were found between the 2 formulations based on the pharmacokinetic measurements of amlodipine and benazeprilat. The rate and extent of absorption of the tablets were found to be comparable to those of the capsules (90% CI, between 80% and 125%). The mean (SD) relative bioavailabilities, as represented by AUC0-∞, of amlodipine and benazeprilat for tablets versus capsules were 1.060 (0.170) versus 0.949 (0.197), respectively. The mean plasma concentration-time profiles of amlodipine and benazeprilat were graphically similar. No adverse effects were observed with either formulation.
The results of this bioavailability comparison study in this 10 population of healthy, male, Taiwanese volunteers suggest that the tablet and capsule formulations of combination amlodipine-benazepril are bioequivalent. Both formulations were well tolerated.
在高血压治疗中,联合治疗很重要,因为全球范围内抗高血压单药治疗仅对40%的患者有效。氨氯地平是一种起效缓慢、作用持续时间长的二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂。盐酸贝那普利是一种前体药物,经酯酶水解为活性代谢产物贝那普利拉,一种血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂。1995年,美国食品药品监督管理局批准使用氨氯地平 - 贝那普利复方胶囊制剂治疗高血压。
本研究旨在比较氨氯地平 - 贝那普利复方胶囊制剂与片剂制剂在健康志愿者中的生物利用度和耐受性。
这项单剂量、双序列、双周期、开放标签、交叉研究招募了血压正常的健康成年男性志愿者。受试者被随机分配到2种治疗序列中的1种:先服用含5 mg氨氯地平加10 mg贝那普利的单剂量片剂,然后服用含相同剂量每种药物的单剂量胶囊(AB),或者反之(BA)。每种药物的治疗期包括第1天的给药和药代动力学分析,随后在第2至7天进行药代动力学分析。治疗期之间有4周的洗脱期。进行药代动力学分析时,在给药前以及给药后20、40、60、80和100分钟以及2、3、4、5、6、7、8、10、12、24、36、60、84、108、132和156小时采集系列血样。通过受试者访谈和自发报告评估耐受性。
12名健康台湾男性受试者(平均[标准差]年龄,23.5[1.7]岁)参与了该研究。根据氨氯地平和贝那普利拉的药代动力学测量结果,两种制剂之间未发现生物利用度有统计学显著差异。发现片剂的吸收速率和程度与胶囊相当(90%置信区间,80%至125%之间)。以AUC0 - ∞表示的氨氯地平和贝那普利拉片剂与胶囊的平均(标准差)相对生物利用度分别为1.06(0.17)和0.949(0.197)。氨氯地平和贝那普利拉的平均血浆浓度 - 时间曲线在图形上相似。两种制剂均未观察到不良反应。
在这群健康台湾男性志愿者中进行的这项生物利用度比较研究结果表明,氨氯地平 - 贝那普利复方片剂和胶囊制剂具有生物等效性。两种制剂耐受性均良好。