Suppr超能文献

夏威夷原住民对生物样本库的看法。

Native Hawaiian views on biobanking.

作者信息

Tauali i Maile, Davis Elise Leimomi, Braun Kathryn L, Tsark JoAnn Umilani, Brown Ngiare, Hudson Maui, Burke Wylie

机构信息

University of Hawai`i, 1960 East-west Road, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA,

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2014 Sep;29(3):570-6. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0638-6.

Abstract

Genomic science represents a new frontier for health research and will provide important tools for personalizing health care. Biospecimen-based research is an important mechanism for expanding the genomic research capacity, and indigenous peoples are a target of biospecimen-based research due to their relative isolation and the potential to discover rare or unique genotypes. This study explored Native Hawaiian perceptions of and expectations for biobanking. Ten discussion groups were conducted with Native Hawaiians (N = 92), who first heard a presentation on biobanking. Six themes emerged: (1) biobank governance by the Native Hawaiian community, (2) research transparency, (3) priority of Native Hawaiian health concerns, (4) leadership by Native Hawaiian scientists accountable to community, (5) re-consenting each time specimen is used, and (6) education of Native Hawaiian communities. Considered together, these findings suggest that biobanking should be guided by six principles that comprise "G.R.E.A.T. Research" (Governance, Re-consent, Education, Accountability, Transparency, Research priorities). These recommendations are being shared with biobanking facilities in Hawai'i as they develop protocols for biobanking participation, governance, and education. These findings also inform researchers and indigenous peoples throughout the world who are working on biobanking and genomic research initiatives in their nations.

摘要

基因组科学是健康研究的新前沿,将为个性化医疗保健提供重要工具。基于生物样本的研究是扩大基因组研究能力的重要机制,由于原住民相对隔离且有可能发现罕见或独特的基因型,他们成为基于生物样本研究的目标。本研究探讨了夏威夷原住民对生物样本库的看法和期望。与92名夏威夷原住民进行了10个讨论小组,他们首先听取了关于生物样本库的介绍。出现了六个主题:(1)夏威夷原住民社区对生物样本库的治理;(2)研究透明度;(3)夏威夷原住民健康问题的优先性;(4)对社区负责的夏威夷原住民科学家的领导力;(5)每次使用样本时重新征得同意;(6)对夏威夷原住民社区的教育。综合来看,这些发现表明生物样本库应以包含“伟大研究”(治理、重新征得同意、教育、问责、透明度、研究重点)的六项原则为指导。随着夏威夷的生物样本库制定参与、治理和教育协议,这些建议正在与它们分享。这些发现也为世界各地从事生物样本库和基因组研究计划的研究人员和原住民提供了参考。

相似文献

1
Native Hawaiian views on biobanking.夏威夷原住民对生物样本库的看法。
J Cancer Educ. 2014 Sep;29(3):570-6. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0638-6.

引用本文的文献

8
Indigenous Peoples and research: self-determination in research governance.原住民与研究:研究治理中的自决权
Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Nov 15;8:1272318. doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.1272318. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

4
Genetic research in native communities.原住民社区的基因研究。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2008 Winter;2(4):321-7. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0046.
6
Ethical, legal, and policy issues: dominating the biospecimen discussion.伦理、法律和政策问题:主导生物样本讨论
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Dec;16(12):2521-3. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2758.
8
The patentability of the Native Hawaiian genome.夏威夷原住民基因组的可专利性。
Am J Law Med. 2007;33(1):119-39. doi: 10.1177/009885880703300104.
9
Biospecimen "ownership": counterpoint.生物样本“所有权”:对立观点
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Feb;16(2):190-1. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-1004.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验